Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 18, 1983. Page 7 <br />E:c.?TH (,ONT) Adams stated that he would still support the motion but <br />that it wasn't_ his desire to and that. Adams noted his <br />two concerns about it: l - He doesn't want to make <br />things any more difficult for the applicant. 2 - He <br />recalled that the planning Commission had discussion <br />before of hardcover in the Baldur Park area and he felt <br />that the consensus was that the sizeable marsh area in <br />back of Mr. Roth's garage a^ts as a filtering agent for <br />runoff that does runoff too fast. He noted that this <br />area was so close to the water table anyway that a lar^e <br />part of the rain that falls whether its grass or gravel <br />or asphalt its going to runoff of there. So its one of <br />the parts of the lake that he personally doesn't have a <br />lot of concern about that. <br />Goetten noted that the BalAur Park area is highly <br />sensitive area and that whatever you can Flo to cut gown <br />on hardcover is important. <br />Adams amen:ied his motion adding cond:''ion 46 that a <br />hardcover tradeoff be established using the gravel on <br />the north side of the road. <br />Sime seconded. <br />Adams stater] that if the appl icant .chooses to move the <br />garage towards the marsh, then he would have 5 - 10' of <br />additional driveway,then the gravel has to go. Point <br />45 to read - offering applicant the possibility of <br />construction on other si.ie of road meeting all the same <br />conditions. <br />Vote: Ayes f71, Nays (1). Motion Failed. <br />McDonald, Callahan, and Goett.en mA4ority opinions. <br />McDonald noted that when they have a chance to ,lean up <br />An area thAt they should take advantagA of that. <br />Secondly it had less impAct, on LAke Minnetonka and <br />thirdly theres enough areA on the lot with the main <br />house to Accommolate the garage. No reason t; put -+ <br />garage on the other side of the street without a <br />pertinent structure. <br />.Olahan moved to table Roth's application until Mr. <br />Roth cAn meet with the Planning Commission and Also <br />until the Planning Commission members that were <br />members in 1992 to voice their views. 0 <br />Callahan withdrew the motion to table and move to deny <br />it. <br />Call ih.an mr,ve 1 t., t.ahl e Roth's appl icAt ion until the <br />next PIAnn inq (7,..mmi i-ti�,n meet ing. <br />