Agenda Packet Cc - regular meeting 10/24/1988

Home Browse Search

To: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Co:ianission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date: August 8, 1988 Subject: #1310 Howard F. Eisinger, 3245 Wayzata Boulevard - Renewal Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Zoning District - RR-lB Pertinent Sections of the Code - Section 10.03, Subdivision 19, 20 - Conditional use permit for fill and grading in excess of 100 cubic yards. Section 10.09 - Conditional use permit procedure. Review of Application - Renewal of conditional use permit - Application N1103 approved by the Council on June 8, 1987. Application involves the filling of approximately 100,000 cubic yards of clean fill within a 12.5 acre property - former dump site. Applicant proposes no changes from the original application approved by the Council. Fill to be placed such that the average height of fill to be maintained at 51. All lard alterations shall take place 35' from the adjacent wetland areas. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Staff Memos to Council Reviewing Application #1103 Exhibit E - Cook's Sketch of a Typical Cross Section Exhibit F - Braun Engineering Letter Dated 5/28/87 Exhibit G - Proposed Fill Site - Plan Exhibit H - Cross Section East/West Exhibit I - Cross Section North/South Exhibit J - Resolution #2192 Approving Original Conditional Use Fermit Review of Current Application - The applicant appeared before the Council at their July llth meeting requesting an extension of the original conditional use permit. Staff advised the Council that an extension could be granted for a period of 30 to 60 days but asked the applicant to define the status of the project. Mr. Eisinger confirmed that nothing had begun as yet, and the in no way could he conceive that the project could be completed within ) days, or for that fact, by the end of November. Staff advised the C^uncil that applicant's best option would be to file a renewal application of the original conditional use Fermit, providing no changes from the original application, as it was clear, Mr. Eisinger would require another year to complete total fill proje,-:t of 100,000 cubic yards. The applicant presents application #1310, a renewal conditional use Fermit, without any changes from the original application submitted over a year ago.