Laserfiche WebLink
L ��( Ls v <br />7" <br />MINUT10_5 OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL M1-TING HELD MAY 28, 1985. PAGE A <br />��• fur <br />5-1?-97 <br />Acting Mayor Frahm advised Asplund that after the patics are <br />rc �ved, that the around should be 7odded. <br />Councilmember L. Alams noted that he has a problem approving <br />anything in the 0-75' setback area. <br />Coe,nc: 'r mt" Ad:sins moved, Acting Mayor Frahm seconded, <br />to Resc:,l!..ion #1768, A Resolution denying variances <br />fe _ *enceany patio concrete request with do dline date <br />for remc,val of patic,s'for June 15, 1985, for 3424 Eastlake <br />Street and July 23, 1985, for 3444 Eastlake Street and the <br />request for deck platfurm and screened porch to be referred <br />to the Planning Commis•ion for their rev-ew. Motion, Ayes <br />(2), Nay:= (1). <br />Counci?memrer T. Adams voted nay. <br />#897 CHUCK PETERSON <br />825 OLD LONG LAKE ROAD <br />PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION <br />Chuck Leterscn was present. Assistant Zoning Adminis- <br />trator Gaffron stated that the surveyor reconfirmed the dry <br />buildable area that Council requested at the last meeting. <br />Gaffron conirmed that there is 2.0 acres of dry .�uildat,le <br />per lot in the area identified strictly as - ,eascnal <br />draina.:>.ay. <br />Councilmember T. Ada, moved, Councilmember L. Adams <br />seconded, tc ap* the preliminary subdivision <br />application of Chuck erson. Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). <br />i903 ARD FERRELL <br />WATERTOWN ROAD <br />ZONING APPEAL Mr. and Mrs. Waru Ferrell were present. Assistant Zoning <br />Administrator Gaffron explained that the applicant was <br />brc fight in under a :oning appeal in order to save the <br />appE giant some money. Gaffron explained that if the <br />applicant had applied for a v,..rianre t' -he application <br />would be more costly and with thf- Coo- ast precedents <br />the Council would probably have d= application. <br />C'i'-v Ai torn,, Rad asked how much full variance <br />a cation vci._ : tiave cost. Radio noteu that Lr allowing <br />t apllicant ; c appeals p_ocedurt: the City is ,3ving the <br />Rpr' 'cant money, ' ut by handling this matter the -'i'_y is not <br />n,+ this app.' ication ,is a variance and not using the <br />s dards. Padio noted that the decision reached <br />t. ices not vresume that the same decision woul-I re <br />rea, . . on < I 1 variance appli ^ ^n. <br />Assistant. Z Wminist tor Gaffron stated teat the <br />variance rpp, on would be $15C, plus the applicant's <br />,xpense for au _tonal surveying work, plus the extra <br />,..�..r.ae septic testing for each lot. Gaffron estimated <br />/r./ <br />