Laserfiche WebLink
Additional Comments and Planning Commission Recommendation - <br />October 19, 1988 <br />Additional Rxhibits - <br />Exhibit H - Plat Map Locating Property Owners Present at 10/3/88 Mtg <br />Note - Exhibit G is not included in your Council packets, but will be <br />available at the Council meeting. <br />The visual/noise impact of the structure upon the surrounding <br />residential properties was discussed with the neighbors in attendance. Mr. <br />McDowell & Mr. Fox appeared satisfied because of the elevation of the <br />structure, the location of the plantings and the existing topography would <br />shield the structure from the view of the adjacent properties along the <br />west boundary. Review Exhibit H, Mrs. Pesek advised that she had walked <br />the property and was concerned that the structure at its present location <br />would present a major impact on their view to the south and southeast. The <br />applicant was Asked to provide view elevations for the Council in order to <br />determine the degree of impact on the neighbor to the north. It is my <br />understanding that the applicant will provide photographs of the north <br />elevation at your meeting. <br />There was additional discussion regarding potential of installing <br />berms along the west property line providing further screening to the Fox <br />property. The applicant was advised that phis type of berming would <br />require a separate conditional use permit review by the City. <br />The Planning Commission adopted the staff recommendation and noted the <br />following findings and hardships: <br />1. Proposed structure is necessary to maintain the golf course. <br />2. The only other alternative is to construct multiple 1,000 s.f. <br />structures which would create even more of a visual impact for the <br />adjoining neighboring residential properties and require additional <br />tree removal. <br />The enclosed resolution :ias been drafted for your consideration and <br />action. <br />