My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-24-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Orono
>
City Council
>
1988
>
10-24-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2026 10:57:01 AM
Creation date
9/30/2025 9:11:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet City Council
Section
City Council
Subject
regular meeting
Document Date
10/24/1988
Retention Effective Date
9/30/2025
Retention
Permanent After File Date
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
556
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Additional Comments and Planning Commission Recommendation - <br />October 19, 1988 <br />Additional Rxhibits - <br />Exhibit H - Plat Map Locating Property Owners Present at 10/3/88 Mtg <br />Note - Exhibit G is not included in your Council packets, but will be <br />available at the Council meeting. <br />The visual/noise impact of the structure upon the surrounding <br />residential properties was discussed with the neighbors in attendance. Mr. <br />McDowell & Mr. Fox appeared satisfied because of the elevation of the <br />structure, the location of the plantings and the existing topography would <br />shield the structure from the view of the adjacent properties along the <br />west boundary. Review Exhibit H, Mrs. Pesek advised that she had walked <br />the property and was concerned that the structure at its present location <br />would present a major impact on their view to the south and southeast. The <br />applicant was Asked to provide view elevations for the Council in order to <br />determine the degree of impact on the neighbor to the north. It is my <br />understanding that the applicant will provide photographs of the north <br />elevation at your meeting. <br />There was additional discussion regarding potential of installing <br />berms along the west property line providing further screening to the Fox <br />property. The applicant was advised that phis type of berming would <br />require a separate conditional use permit review by the City. <br />The Planning Commission adopted the staff recommendation and noted the <br />following findings and hardships: <br />1. Proposed structure is necessary to maintain the golf course. <br />2. The only other alternative is to construct multiple 1,000 s.f. <br />structures which would create even more of a visual impact for the <br />adjoining neighboring residential properties and require additional <br />tree removal. <br />The enclosed resolution :ias been drafted for your consideration and <br />action. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.