Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1335 <br />September 29, 1988 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />Review of Application - <br />The applicant proposes construction of a 60'xl80' maintenance and <br />st age building. The existing maintenance shed will be removed upon <br />.:c_.,letion of this installation. Review F, the existing house noted on the <br />site plan to the south of the proposed structure will be removed and in <br />fact shoo".d be removed rrior to construction as all access drives will be <br />blocked. ^he adjacent Lana alterations will also necessitate the remc,val <br />of the existing house The maintenance structure meets all required <br />setbacks. In earlier ,l.ns, the proposed structure was located <br />approximately 50' from the «eat property line. The club has worked closely <br />with the owner of the house to the northwest of the property (review <br />Exhibit F), to resolves the �mpact of the major structure. As a rp%ult, the <br />structure has been relocated 165' from the west lot line. The r w location <br />will allow the saving of sp-eral tree, that will continue .:o provide a <br />nature screening barrier to the :surrounding residential zoned properties. <br />The iuilding will be sprinkled as required by Appendix E of the <br />Uniform Building Code. There is adequate water supply and adequate <br />pressure to provide for the sprinkler system within a few hundred feet from <br />the proposed struc° ure. The final grades have been shown and a�;proved by <br />staff. Drainage continues to flow in the same pattern. Elevations have <br />not been included in your packet for the new structure but a rendering of <br />the project will be provided at the meeting. Staff has revieweJ that <br />elevation and Sees no major concern for the City. The maximum height of <br />the peak of the roof will be 18'6". Access will be via the existing road <br />system. A single driveway will be constzucted to serve the proposed <br />maintenance structure. <br />The area variance required for the oversized structure is the only <br />real issue for this review. Sectior 10.03, Subdivision 9 sets no limits on <br />barns, stables, or greenhouses. A commercial greenhouse could be placed on <br />a residential prope without any s4 ze/area limitaticns. The troposed <br />size of thi —.!ct certai -,ly meets the nAeds of this size club. One <br />large stru ov. s less of an inpact than several smaller maintenance <br />sheds spr oughout the propL-ty. The existing maintenance shed <br />exceeds `ham ,red area. <br />