Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1338 <br />September 30, 1988 <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />6. There is an existing 201x20' gravel parking area in the 0-75' zone <br />adjacent to Crystal Bay Road. Planning Commission may wish to <br />consider whether the applicants need this parking once a garage is <br />constructed, or whether this parking area can be re-woved and revert <br />to grass. A large share of the hardcover on the property is made up <br />of a wood deck area around the north and west sides of the house. <br />There would not appear to be significant amounts of additional <br />hardcover that could be removed in the 75-250' zone. <br />7. Staff is currently working with the Schibillas to determine whether <br />the "33' easement for public highways", which shows up on the survey <br />staff had on file, as well as in applicants torrens title,is in <br />effect. If so, staff must recommend that any Planning Commission <br />recommendation for approval include the condition that no garage <br />permit may be issued until that easement is removed, which would to a <br />degree depend upon whether the City or County had any current or <br />future interest in use of that easement for right-of-way purposes. <br />8. The proposed garage will use the existing driveway access location, <br />and there are no sight distance problems associated with this <br />location. <br />Staff Recommendation - <br />Staff would recommend approval of the proposed garage location, <br />finding that the location is consistent with evistinq garages in the <br />neighborhood, and meets the 10' rear and side setbacks that would be in <br />effect. Note that although this and 6 or 7 adjacent properties access to a <br />private road on railroad right-of-way, technically the legal access for <br />this property is to the north on Crystal Bay Road, hence the railway <br />right-of-way line is considered a rear lot line. The 30' setback for <br />garage doors facing a street does not specifically apply. <br />Staff would recommend approval of the hardcover variance. <br />Staff would ask Planning Commission and the applicant to consider <br />whether a strict need for an over size garage exists, and what hardships <br />would be presented if the length and the width dimensions of the garage <br />decrease. Given the topography and the logical 2 story configuration, <br />limiting the useable second f loor garage space due to excess space below <br />might not be reasonable; is there the possibility that the garage can be <br />constructed with a half basement ? <br />If the Planning Commission recommends approval of the floor area <br />variances requested, such approval would appropriately be granted under the <br />condition that the garage and attached space below it may never be used as <br />a dwelling unit, cannot not be rented as a dwelling unit, may not have <br />plumbing installed, and the applicant should be advised that the property <br />does not meet the citeria for granting of a quest house conditional use <br />permit. <br />1`gain, any approval would have to be conditioned on a resolution of <br />the easement issue. <br />