Project Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

TO: Mayor Grabek Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator DATE: May 17, 1988 SUBJECT: 11262 Curtis Hagfors, 1412 Baldur Park Road- - Request for Amendments to r.evious Variance Approval PERTINENT FACTS Approved 5-9-88 Revised Request Garage Street Setback 17' (Var.-131) 21' (Var.-91) Driveway Hardcover 432 s.f. 528 s.f. Sidewalk Hardcover 82 s.f. 111 s.f. House North Side Setback 10, 9.6' Total 75-250' Hardcover 2572 a.f.(35.31) 2697 s.f.(37.01) DISCUSSION At Council's May 9th meeting, variances were approved for the above referenced application. After that meeting, the applicant looked more closely at his property and decided to request some revisions to his proposal, as follows: 1. Instead of a 17' street setback, he would set the garage back even further to 211, to be in line with neighboring garages and provide him with a bit more room to park his car in front of the garage. 2. As a result of that greater driveway setback, his additional driveway hardcover is 96 s.f. 3. Instead of a 2' sidewalk width as was approved, he is requesting a 3' width. That sidewalk will be a little shorter with the revised location, but will be an additional 29 s.f. of hardcover. 4. Applicant notes in his letter of request that further investigation of his costs of moving the house will dictate that it be merely lifted and set down on the new foundation, not moved in the 0- 75' setback zone. However, he is finding that due to the existing floor joist layout and the necessary orientation of the beams to ri �e the house, it will be difficult if not impossible to slide the ' e sideways. He is requesting to keep the existing 9.6' setback ra....er than move the house 6 inches to meet the required 10' side setback. This proposal will result in hardcover increase 125 s.f. over that which was approved May 9, for a final total of 37.01 rather than 35.3% previously approved. !!A// RNCOINNNai1TION Council has 3 op�-ions: 1. Send the revised application back to the Planning Commission for additional review. 2. Deny the additional variances requested. 3. Approve the additional variances requested. If Council wishes to approve this request, the previous resolution can bye revised to reflect the changes.