My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1982-01-05 Septic System Design Report
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
D
>
Dickey Lake Drive
>
765 Dickey Lake Drive - 34-118-23-22-0010
>
Septic
>
1982-01-05 Septic System Design Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2025 1:39:56 PM
Creation date
9/24/2025 1:28:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
765
Street Name
Dickey Lake
Street Type
Drive
Address
765 Dickey Lake Drive
PIN
3411823220010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0615 Ringer Subdivision <br />Page 5 <br />T.ot 6, Block 1 <br />Peres PB61 thru PB66. Borings BB61 thru BB63. Average perc <br />rates at both sites are acceptable. Slopes range from 2 to 4%. <br />Mottling started at a depth of approximately 2.4 feet, with <br />actual water level at 2.5 to 4.41. A standard mound system <br />should be use4 at both sites. <br />Lot 7, Block 1 <br />Peres PB71 thru PB76. Boring3 BB71 thru BB73. Slopes average 2-3i. <br />Perc rates were fairly slow, with the secondary site being somewhat <br />slower than the limit (however, the justification for Lot 5, <br />Block 1 also applies here). Actual water level ranged from 1.7 <br />to 3.5' with mottling generally below 2.51. A standard mound is <br />recommended for both sites. <br />Lot 1, Block 2 fyUAL j pT & &LOCK Z <br />Peres PA11 thrs PA18. Borings BA11 thr BA13. Slopes are very <br />flat. Mottling was indicated beio Z with actual water <br />encountered below 2.01. Two secB° y sites were tested. All <br />sites are acceptable for a standard mound system. <br />Lot 2, Block 2 <br />Peres PA21 thru PA26. Borings BA21 thru BA23. Very flat slopes. <br />1ottling occurs at 2.0 to 2.4 with actual water encountered <br />below 2.4'. Perc rates on both s'_,ss are acceptable. A mound <br />system is recommended for both sites. <br />Lot 3L Block 2 <br />Peres PA31 thru PA36. Borings BA31 thru DA33. Slopes averaged <br />2 to 5%. Mottling starts at a depth of 2.0-3.5'. Actual water <br />level was below 2.51. Perc: rates are'bcceptable. Mound systems <br />are recommended for both sites. <br />Lot 4, Block 2 <br />Peres PA41 thru PA46. ^.orings BA41 thru BA43. Slopes are very <br />flat. Mottling generally was found below 2.01, with actual <br />water level at about 4.01. Perc rate for primary site is <br />acceptable; perc rate for secondary site is slightly slow but <br />acceptable for a mound based on the justification referred to <br />for Lot 5, nloek 1. I recommend a mound system for both sites. <br />Let 5, 'dock 2 <br />Peres PA51 thru PA56. Borings BA51 thru DA53. Slopes ara very <br />flat. Mottling occurred below 1.2 foot with actual water below <br />4.0 feet. Perc rates are acceptable for the primary site and <br />-lightly slow at the secondary site. (Rofer to Lot 5, Block 1) <br />TLis lot has the overall worst .yet of percolation sates of the <br />division. 'However, only two of the peres were taker in the <br />topsoil, the others, two of which were very slow, wire at depth. <br />1 reconunend that a mound system be used on this site. If peres <br />were re --taken in the topsoil, it is likely they would pass as <br />did nearly all others done in this runner. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.