Laserfiche WebLink
2. Process adoption <br />Process Elements <br />1. Draft criteria/site layouts - consultant <br />2. Review by staff <br />3. Commentary by Planning Commission - <br />Focusing on criteria and land use/zoning site <br />issues <br />4. Council commentary based on draft layouts plus staff <br />and Planning Commission commentary <br />5. Consultant revise site criteria and layout to <br />accomodate issues <br />G. Consultant do further work related to general <br />layouts, building estimates, construction estimates <br />including all site costs <br />7. Staff and Council review <br />Options <br />A. Adopt as presented <br />B. Amend and adopt <br />C. Table <br />RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the Council accept the <br />information presented as to site evaluation progress to date. <br />Additionally it is recommended that the Council adopt the process <br />that is presented in Issue 2. <br />PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , Seconded by __, that the Council <br />accept the information regarding the progress of the site <br />evaluation together adoptinq a process for development of the <br />criteria for the site and specific commentaries on the sites <br />currently being analyzed. Ayes __, Nays __ <br />cc: David Kroos, Boarman and Associates <br />