My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Baldur Park Road
>
1396 Baldur Park Road - 08-117-23-31-0002
>
Land Use
>
91-1689, VAR
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/18/2025 9:56:56 AM
Creation date
9/18/2025 9:56:08 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A RESOLUTION GRANTING <br />VARIANCES TO <br />MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE <br />SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 AND <br />SECTION 10.24, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) <br />FILE 11689 <br />WHEREAS, Terry Sadler (hereinafter "the applicant") is owner <br />of the property located at 1396 Baldur Park Road within the City of <br />Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: <br />Lot 16, Baldur Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the <br />property"); and <br />WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for <br />variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to <br />allow hardcover in excess of the 25% hardcover normally allowed in the <br />75-250 1 lakeshore setback zone and variance to Section 10.24, <br />Subdivision 5 (B) to allow a proposed three-season porch to be located <br />9.9' from the side lot line where a 10' side yard setback is normally <br />required. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, <br />Minnesota: <br />FINDINGS <br />1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File f1689. <br />2. The property is located in the LR-lC Single Family Lakeshore <br />Residential Zoning District. <br />3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on <br />October 21, 19 91, and on a vote of 5 to 1 recommended <br />approval of the proposed variances based upon the following <br />findings: <br />a) The 0.1' side setback variance is appropriate since it <br />will allow the proposed porch to match the existing <br />side line of the house, and such a variance wi 11 have <br />no significant impact on the neighboring property. <br />Page 1 of 6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.