Laserfiche WebLink
M <br />MINUTZS OF THE PLRWING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JUNR 6, 1988 <br />#1280 WICINN CONTINU <br />No. Weihe stated she was under the impression that a <br />hardcover trade-off would be accepteble to allow her to <br />build her additions. <br />Johnson felt that the applicants proposed hardcover <br />trade-off was consistent with past applications. <br />William Franklin, owner of Lot 1 adjacent to applicant's <br />property, stated that he has a legal easement access <br />across applicant's property and showed the Planning <br />Commission a survey locating the easement. <br />Ms. Weihe stated that according to her legal research, <br />Mr. Franklin does not have a legal easement but has <br />tried to work with Mr. Franklin regarding this issue. <br />She did not feel this issue was relevant to this <br />application. <br />Bellows voiced concern with recommending approval of the <br />variances prior to resolution of the easement issue. <br />Planning Commission made the following recommendations <br />to applicant regarding her application: <br />The structure -to -structure setback must be 10' if <br />detached, and if an attachel garage is built, it must <br />have footings and a f irewa l 1. <br />Johnson and Bellows felt the house could be decreased <br />slightly to decrease the hardcover. <br />Moos felt there were many issues to be resolved before <br />- <br />making a recommendation. <br />Kelley felt the structural hardcover should be reduced. <br />Bellows suggested that applicant find out if the <br />existing foundation car support building additions <br />upward rather than outward to create less hardcover. <br />Me. Neihe felt that by looking at the house, it was <br />evident that the house could not support building upward <br />additions. She noted that she is removing a substantial <br />mount of hardcove.L which should justify allowing the <br />proposal. <br />There were no other comments fr he public regarding <br />this matter. <br />it was moved by Kelley, seconded by Johnson, t� table <br />this application pending resolve of the easement issui <br />and for applican• to review the proposal baser on <br />Planning Comniissio:; .. cr mnents. Motion, byes 4, Nays 0. <br />8 <br />