Laserfiche WebLink
t <br />'t <br />Zoning File #1280 <br />Page 2 <br />Exibting Proeosed <br />0-75' �30.48 �30.9% <br />75-250' 49.09, 46.6% <br />4. Although the hardcover does show slight decreases in both <br />9-75' and 75-250' zones, the applicant's intent ;s to <br />increase structural hardcover on the property by half again <br />as much as now exists. The structural increases are in <br />additional decks and in additional structure. The <br />structural hardcover changes are as follows: <br />Existing <br />Proeosed <br />-2,157 <br />0-75' (N) 1,313 s.f. <br />s.f. <br />75-250' 637 s.f. <br />709 s.f. <br />0-75' (S) 0 s.f. <br />0 s.f. <br />1,950^s.f. <br />2,866 s.f. <br />Net Change <br />+916.s.f. <br />5. The proposed hardcover removals and additions are shown <br />on applicants diagrams which are listed as Exhibits G and H. <br />Note that the existing deck of width 9.4' will extend <br />approximately 1.5' closer to the lake, according to the <br />design plans. Also, because the existing second story deck <br />above the westerly room will become a living room, applicant <br />is proposing a deck expansion to the west. <br />6. Note that the additional room expansion, where there <br />currently is no structural hardcover, is between the house <br />and the garage, where it will have no significant visual <br />impact from the northerly lake, but will be quite visible <br />from the west. <br />7. Applicant is proposing a 5' separation between the new <br />construction and the existing garage, with the new addition <br />to be archit^ctural ly attached to the garage by a covered <br />wa1k•+ay. Fro:n a zoning code standpoint; this .:ould appear <br />to require a variance to the requirement of 10' separation <br />betwei-n buildings. From a fire safety st,-ndpoint, the <br />garage and the house can be constricted with the appropriate <br />fire walls so that building code standards can bf met. <br />8. Note that the proposed additions will :)e constructed to <br />meet the sine setback requirement of 10'. <br />9. The current structure 3utting above the house does meet <br />the required I0' maximum heiqht limitation. <br />