Laserfiche WebLink
IR <br />1) it Is at least one acre in size, and the average <br />width of the lot is at least 100 feet; and <br />2) it is either served by public sanitary sewer or <br />meets all the septic system requirements of the City or <br />other governmental body; and <br />3) it otherwise meets the requirements of this or <br />other applicable ordinances. <br />Under this Code, the Council, at their option, could have granted a <br />lot area variance for a lot of single separate ownership, but the Code <br />again did not specifically discuss any standards for the separation of <br />commonly owned lots. <br />22. City policy regarding the separation of unsewered, undeveloped <br />substandard, contiguous lots in common ownership was clearly defined <br />by an action of the City Council in 1981, in which the separation of a <br />developed 1.4 acre lot from the adjacent vacant 1.7 acre, 120.3 foot <br />wide vacant lot in the LR-IA 2-acre, 200 foot width, unsewered zone <br />was denied. (Application No. 635, Council action to deny on October <br />26, 1981, based on: a) lack of demonstrated hardship; b) no <br />sanitary sewer available; c) .nsufficient area; d) insufficient <br />width. <br />23. The 1984 Zoning Code amendments included the addition of Section <br />10.03, Subdivision 6 (C), which prohibited the "transfer or sale of <br />non -conforming, undeveloped lots not served by pudic sanitary sewer, <br />aligned in a contiguous arrangement, undivided by a public or private <br />road or road easement and under same or commcn ownership" unless <br />specifically approved by the City Council, or unless the resulting <br />lots satisfy the area and width requirements of the Zoninq Code. No <br />performance standards for approval of such transfers appear in the <br />code. <br />24. At least 13 properties or groups of properties in a situation <br />similar to Ferrells with a high potential for request of similar <br />variances have been identified within the City of Oronc. <br />25. Since January 1, 1975, when the 2 acre RR-1B zoning district <br />became effective, no permits have been issued for ^ew residences on <br />commonly owned substandard lots in the RR-1B district. Of 153 new <br />residence permits issued in the RR-lB district from 1/1/75 to 5/l/86, <br />145 permits have been issued for conforming lots, 7 permits have been <br />issued for substandard lots of record in single separate ownership due <br />to the inability of applicants to combine or acquire additional land <br />to create conforming lots, and 1 permit was issued to demolish and <br />rebuild on a substandard single separate ownership lot where a house <br />was already existing. The City of Orono has consistently denied <br />permits for substandard lots owned in common with adjacent developed <br />lots in the RR-iB district. <br />Page 7 of 9 <br />