My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-22-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Orono
>
City Council
>
1988
>
08-22-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2026 10:57:02 AM
Creation date
9/15/2025 12:03:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet City Council
Section
City Council
Subject
regular meeting
Document Date
8/22/1988
Retention Effective Date
9/15/2025
Retention
Permanent After File Date
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
305
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
01tvil.1.1: 1;. FiS111:14 .lei. <br />VrruRN'liY AT LAN' <br />is �.,crn�,xc ciao-:1�•il <br />Vt :A (l()Uli 012 <br />July 13, 1988 <br />City of Orono <br />P.O. Box 66 <br />Crystal Bay, MN 55323 <br />Attention: Mr. Michael P. Gaffron <br />nno1 NoRMAN GYNTER <br />MINNHAr•c LIS, Atv. t9.3411371 lid <br />Dear Mr. Gaffron: <br />I am not sure whether I will be able to attend the Planning <br />Commission meeting on July 18, 1988. This letter is written, <br />however, in objection to the request by Allan and Shirley Rezabek <br />for a lakeshore setback variance which would allow them to con- <br />struct a privacy fence between our two properties. <br />My reasons are as follows: <br />1. There has been for a long time an old dilapidated unat- <br />tract;-ve fence existing between our properties which at all <br />times has been located entirely on my property. I had a <br />portion of this fence removed approximately a month ago. At <br />the time of its removal most of the fence posts were rotten, <br />many of the wooden slats were broken, cracked or loose, and <br />the fence could not be properly straightened without re- <br />placement of some of its structure. <br />2. The existing fence was a neighborhood t -, sore. Appraisers <br />who have appraised our property for refinancing purposes as <br />well as real estate appraisers had all advised us that the <br />fence was a clear detraction to the entrance to our proper`_ <br />and reduced the market value of our home. <br />3. One of the more important reasons for removing a portion of <br />the fence was to eliminate a potentially dangerous situation <br />since our new driveway would closely abut the south side of <br />the fence and cars backing out of our garage down the <br />driveway would be hidden by the fence causing a blind corner <br />where neither driver nor pedestrians coming up our driveway <br />could see the moving vehicle until it -tersected with the <br />approach. We have many young small ch�_lc:iren in our <br />neighborhood, running, riding bikes, etc. up and down our <br />driveway who could be endangered. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.