08-22-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JULY 18, 1988 #1303 ALLAN REZABEK-CONTINUED property and was a factor in his decision to puichase the property. Mr. Fisher stated that when the judicial markers were placed it was the first time they realized ti,at the fence was on their property. The Fishers have just finished a remodeling project that added on a storage shed and garage that brought the driveway down along the property line. They spent a considerable amount of money for landscaping and feel that the fence detracts from that. Is is their opinion that the fence creates a safety hazard as it creates a blind intersection; All in all the fence is an eyesore and a safety hazard and should not be reinstalled. Mr. Rezabek stated that he is in the process of selling their house: and they have had several realtors and perspective buyers view the property. No one has indicated that: they dislike the fence, to the-. contrary, they have had some compliments on the landscaping which was done, to compliment the fence. He does not believe the fence is a safety issue. Commissioner Kelley asked Mr. Fisher as to his preference for the fence up or down. Mr. Fisher responded he would like it down. When asked re would be moving, Mr. Rezabek stated he would, if the house sells, and added he would like to sell the house with the fence. Commissioner Brown, asked for clarification on the safety issue. It was moved by Mr. Cohen, seconded by M=. Kelley, to deny the- lakeshore setback variance application. Motion, Ayes=7, Nays=O, Motions passed. #1304 RICHARD BLOOMQUIST/RICR'S SUPER VALU 3333 SHORELINE DRIArE VARIANCES PUBLIC HEARING The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. The Applicant was not present for this matter. Kelley stater' that the Planning Commission is looking to approve a street setback fo : a pylon sign due to the County Road 15 construction, The additional richt-or-way is being taken by the County. Kelley inquired as to whether there w�7: ld he a guardrail betwe�>. the road sign and the roadway. Mabusth rep'.ied that there is a 4' to " cement pathway and z bouieN -rd about 4' to ", all in all approxin,at 10' of improvements. There w. 1 1 a 1 so be a '_ - ,'2' curb that wi 1 1 border entire area and wi 1 4" take the overhang of tl,_ :ar bumpers. Kelley reiterated t 20' is the required s-ttack for parking and thq Applicant was request :. 01. Mabusth stated that:. has been a procedure to grant 10' street setbac'.-•,,ariances for parking in tier. Navarre area. It was moved by seconded by Moos, _e rF,commend approval of #1304 for a sign variz. it 7' and a street set.,acl f 20'. Mabusth adder that if the Applicant etnning on instal ling " : ew sign, he can only do so upon approval of t' This language w.Zs i. :c. uded in the Motion Motion, Ayes=7, Nays-'_"'. passed. 7