Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JULY 18, 1988 <br />#1305 WASHINGTON SCIENTIFIC, INC. <br />2605 WEST WAYZATA BOULEVARD <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br />PUBLIC HEARING <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. <br />Mr. joe Pallansch, a representative of Washington Scientific, was <br />present for this matter. <br />Mr. Kelley asked Applicant about his opinion as to what the Watershed <br />District wants to do. Mr. Pallansch referred to a letter from the <br />Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and their concern about run-off rates <br />increasing 4%. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the City would <br />work closely with the MCWD in determining the actual size of the pond <br />required for run-off. Mr. Pallansch stated that he would really like to <br />postpone this matter until further discussions took place. <br />It was moved by Hanson, seconded by Cohen to table #1305, Washington <br />Scientific, Inc., Conditional Use Permit. Motion, Ayes=7, Nays=O, Motion <br />Carries. <br />#1306 METRO WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION <br />3280/3286 NORTH SHORE DRIVE <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCES <br />PUBLIC HEARING <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. <br />The Applicants were not present for this matter but had requested that <br />this matter be tabled until a later date when the requested subdivision <br />application would also be reviewed. <br />There were no comments from the public regarding this matter. <br />It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Cohen, to table #1306 Metro Waste <br />Control Commission Conditional Use Permit/Variances. Motion, Ayes=7, <br />Nays=O, Motion passed. Johnson commented that he felt architectural <br />controls were necessary and that noise, odor and landscaping would be <br />additional issues needing attention. <br />#1307 DIANE AND DOUGLAS "ERZ <br />3195 WATERTOWN ROAD <br />VARIANCE <br />PUBLIC HEARING <br />The Affidavit of ''-ication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. <br />Mr. and Mrs. Merz • re present for this matter. <br />Gaffron explaine,i . it the Applicants are requesting a variance to <br />side street setback i <br />:der to construct a deck. <br />There was <br />a previous <br />deck on the property. <br />are proposing a deck that <br />would wrap <br />around the <br />house. The property <br />is approximately 1' from <br />the house <br />which is <br />located about 20' fro-, <br />e paved portion of Leaf <br />Street on <br />that side. <br />There is a sidestreet • <br />k requirement of 50' in <br />this zone. <br />He stated <br />8 <br />