Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JULY 18, 1988 <br />#1303 ALLAN REZABEK-CONTINUED <br />property and was a factor in his decision to purchase the property. Mr. <br />Fisher stated that when the judicial markers were placed it was the first <br />time they realized that the fence was cn their property. The Fishers have <br />just finished a remodeling project that added on a storage shed and garage <br />that brought the driveway down along the property line. They spent a <br />considerable amount of money for landscaping and feel that the fence <br />detracts from that. Is is their opinion that the fence creates a safety <br />hazard as it creates a blind intersection; All in all the fence is an <br />eyesore and a safety hazard and should not be reinstalled. <br />Mr. Rezabek stated that he is in the process of selling their house <br />and they have had several reaitors and perspective buyers view the <br />property. No one has indicated that they dislike the fence, to the <br />contrary, they have had some compliments on the landscaping which was done <br />to compliment the fence. He does not believe the fence is a safety issue. <br />Commissioner Kelley asked Mr. Fisher as to his preference for the <br />fence up or down. Mr. Fisher responded he would like it down. When asked <br />he would be moving, Mr. Rezabek stated he would, if the house sells, and <br />added he would like to sell the house with the fence. Commissioner Brown <br />asked for clarification on the safety issue. <br />It was moved by Mr. Cohen, seconded by Mr. Kelley, to deny the <br />lakeshore setback variance application. Motion, Ayes=7, Nays=O, Motion <br />passed. <br />#1304 RICHARD BLOOMQUIST/RIC:K'S SUPER. VALU <br />3333 SHORELINE DRIVE <br />VARIANCES <br />PUBLIC HEARING <br />The hffidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. <br />The Applicant was not present for this matter. <br />Kelley stated that the Planning Commission is looking to approve a <br />strut setback for a pylon sign due to the County Road 15 construction. <br />The additional right-of-way is being taken by the County. Kelley inquired <br />as to whether there would be a guardrail between the road sign and the <br />roadway. Mabusth replied that there is a 4' to 5' cement pathway and a <br />boulevard about 4' to 5', all in all approximately 10' of improvements. <br />There will also be a 1-1/2' curb that will borrIer the entire area and will <br />take the overhang of the car bumpers. <br />Kelley reiterated that 20' is the required setback for parking and the <br />Applicant was requo sting 0'. Mabusth stated that has been a procedure to <br />grant 10' street setback variances for parking in the Navarre area. <br />It was moved by Johnson, seconded by Moos, to recommend approval of <br />#1304 for a sign vaiiunce of 7' and a street setback of 20'. Mabusth added <br />that if the Applicant. is planning on installing a new sign, he can only do <br />so upon approval of the City. This lanquaqe was included in the Motion. <br />Motion, Ayes=7, Nays-1, Motion passed. <br />7 <br />