08-22-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JULY 18, 1988 #1301 DAVID L. WHITE & FREDRICK C. WHITE -CONTINUED concurred with Mr. Cohen's request for a topographic map. The PC has to be sure that the development of this land is in line with the comprehensive plan of the City. He felt it is important to limit access from County Roads, especially 19, because that traffic will increase over time. Commissioner Johnson agreed that a more comprehens-ve workup was needed as to development alternatives for the property. Kelley asked for further public comments, there were none. Johnson questioned whether it was Hennepin County's position to limit access to the County Roads involved as much as possible. Gaffron responded that although they have not yet responded in this application, typically they would like to limit as far as possible the number of accesses. It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Cohen, to table #1301 pending Applicant's further consideration of a comprehensive development plan and submittal of a topographical map, and review by the City as to the position and cost of the roadway. Motion, Ayes=6, Nays=O, Motion passed. #1207 GENE i CATHERINE SCANLON 2815 CASCO POINT ROAD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 6 VARIANCE THIRD REVIEW Gene and Catherine Scanlon were present for this matter. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the Applicants were seeking the replacement of structures that were damaged in the storm of July 23, 1987. The specific structures involve a lake shore deck, access stairs and a 7' x 7' storage shed. Applicants now propose placing the storage shed underneath the existing or proposed deck, which will allow for a reduction in the hardcover from what was there prior to the storm. The total hardcover for the proposed deck is 165 sq. ft. The plans h&ve been reviewed by the building inspector. Commissioner Kelley asked what the 165 ft. included. Mabusth stated it includes just the decking, and not the 149 sq. ft. of access stairs. Kelley questioned recommendation #2 regarding plantings. Mabusth replied that this procedure is very consistent with what they are now asking of all persons who replace retaining walls in lakeshore yards. She noted that the Applicants have volunteered to reduce hardcover within the 75-250' setback area. Hanson commended the Applicants on making every effort to work on this. Mabusth added that the Scanlons are going directly to the Council on this. In regard to the date the hardcover removals are to take place, Hanson asked Applicants for a date they felt was realistic. Applicants replied next Spring, and June 30, 1989, was agreed upon. The specific hardships that apply in this particular variance are the extreme slop. -f the land and the necessary work required to stabilize that area after t,�e storm. Johnson stated that he did not think this variance was consistent with the 0'-75' policies in that there is a retaining wall, stairs, storage structure and deck all within 25' of the Lake. It was moved by Hanson, seconded by Cohen, t, recommend approval of $1207, Gene & Catherine