Agenda Packet Cc - regular meeting 8/8/1988

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 11, 1988 proposes to move the house :nd, and in selecting the new site, she will consider required setbacks if there is a future division of the property. Mabusth explained that the house would be positioned on property so that at least one acre could be subdivided in the future. Goetten stated that she just assumed that the house was going to be built about where it was and was concerned about any other additions now that the location of building has been moved. Mabusth state,4 that everything would be left as it is depending upon where the driveway for the new principal residence would be located. Callahan inquired as to how far it was from the Channel to what appears to be the lot line running parallel to the vacated alley? Mabusth said it was farther than 75'. Is it possible to divide this property into three? Mabusth stated it was if they meet the 140 ft. lakeshore standard. She has no idea where the Applicant proposes to place the house. Bernhardson stated that it was approximately 380' wide and it would take 420' of width to create three lots. Goetten expressed concern as to whether the City would be giving Applicant a Conditional Use Permit for a guest house and caretaker house and they are now talking about moving the house. Mabusth explained that that was the whole reason why they had to ask the Applicant to come in for the Conditional Use Permit, because of the proposed construction of a new residence. The City Planning staff has to give the Applicant the most background so that when they are planning for the future, when they place that new principal residence, if they are planning to divide the lot in the future, that it has the correcrt setbacks. More than likely the guest house and caretaker house would not stay. Mayor moved to accept the Planning Commission recommendation as stated, seconded. Goetten asked for additional findings showing the additional non- conforming structure. Motion by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Peterson to adopt Resolution #2468 approving C.V.P. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0. #llu.; now;.20 EISINGER REQUEST TO R.-TEND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTI ON # 2 � 9 2 Howar,' Eisinger was present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained that Mr. Eisinger was granted a Conditional Use Permit for his property on Wayzata BoulevLrd last year that rare for one year. The expectation is that he is going to get fill from the I-394 construction and use substantial fill in his property. Zoning Administrator Mabusth outlined some of the options. She Council could deny any extension of the Conditional Use Permit that was granted last year. They could approve it for a specific period of time with an extension, as suggested by Mabusth until October 31. we have been given an indication that the bond has been extended. The conr-ern of the City, which stems from a conditional use permit that was granted after Mr. Fisinger's, is the issue of the amount of time a person has to complete the construction once the construction starts. Mabusth suggested in her staff repo•-t possibly within a 30 to 60 day time period. Applicant has indicated that that would not be a sufficient period of time. The City is concerned with two issues: How long this would be extended in total; and from 7