Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE F3GULAR ORONC COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY Il, 1988 <br />Mayor Grabek suggested that more research be done on the 0'-75' so <br />that there will be no loopholes. Motion made that item #1296 be <br />tabled until appropriate wording can be established to state a <br />denial to protect the intent of the City Code and Ordinances. <br />Callahan interjected that it is clear that they can and must deny <br />the lot area application. It seems to him that the Council could <br />conceptually turn down the accessory dock on the property leaving <br />it to the City Attorney to further advise the Council as to <br />whether or not they would be prohibited from doing such a thing, <br />even if they wanted to. He suggests that in light of fact that he <br />is not in favor of issue, that the matter be denied rather than <br />tabled. Mayor Grabek said he had no problem with this but wanted <br />to find out if the additional time for research was needed by <br />counsel. Attorney Barrett stated that he could not give a <br />coa,clusion at the moment, but wouldn't advise that there is a <br />difficulty with denying the lot area application upon the staff's <br />recommendations or the point disussed at tonight's meeting. <br />Callahan stated that because they do not have a specific <br />resolution here, either on the basis of the Planning Commission's <br />recommendation or otherwise, the staff is suggesting that the <br />Council give them conceptual direction. The Mayor said he had no <br />problem with that and withdrew his motion.. It was moved by <br />Councilmember Callahan, seconded by Mayor Grabek that Council deny <br />the lot area application of Rick Stodole and Merrit Peterson and <br />deny application for an accessory dock on the basis of the <br />Planniny Commission's recommendation and findings and that Council <br />direct the staff to prepare a resolution enbodying those concepts <br />and request that the City Attorney advise the Council as to the <br />status of the use. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0, motion passed. <br />#1299 NANCY HIGGINS <br />3017 NORTH SHORE DRIVE <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br />RESOLUTION #2468 <br />Applicant Higgins was present. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson explained that this is a request <br />for a Conditional Use Permit on a property that currently has a <br />principal structure, a quest house and d caretaker structure. At <br />one time these were two separate lots. The applicant seeks a <br />Conditional Use Permit issued in advance of removal and new <br />construction of the principal structure. The guest house does not <br />have heating and cooling and is being used as a guest house on :r <br />The one issue, and the staff recommends that the proposed <br />resolution be amended to include putting the applicant on notice <br />there is a screened porch in the 0-79 and language should be <br />included that applicant cannot repair or reFlace that structure. <br />The Mayor asked for any comments from the-pplicant. Applicant <br />indicated that they are going to put the i�ouse further to the <br />east, as suggested, in case someone wantf� to subdivide in the <br />future, they will then have -_ne acre. -ti,e Mayor asked about <br />subdivision. Zoning Administrator expl, _ned ttlat applicant <br />