|
builder. that tlle house 01~tionally ®Uld be·
<br />101 aide yard setback line#,whichi' ,l
<br />=.:~:~~~i•, th.! ·requir&d: 75• .lake. setbacJt .. ,,,;J)Ue' ';.~.'.·.:.:..!,•,~,•.~.!.i ... co:~•-r,'e.t; .• ~,b• ho\111e •. , itie likely"t.he\tn• itf .. ·. ,
<br />,,.,,, . .,.,..,._ moving '.t.be house bebind:''t:he·"C•7s,r, : ;~j
<br />... ..,.... ,, .. fofr
<br />1
<br />••gradinfg,.hin,~he•.0-.7
<br />1
<br />s• s
<br />1
<br />one',;f J,·!
<br />' ......... aa.n\ oor O ._ e,uOUSlllfL.• & reayy :.,
<br />.-.xi11tin9, grad• in.,orc!er· to 1td.n,la.i11'e}:tbe , ,i
<br />· · .. :>,:,.,, ,,{'./\\::\\·<. '''ct::\}:",\1:<Y:~S\:t!
<br />'.(!~iiH1ion.and Citl">Council'have}~en a f~
<br />Un<i ·aetback : zone!!>·,. to. cnaa.tE•i;,wa,l:k-· :J
<br />Wat@H 1 application .on Casco i'Oi~t;>'iUl.1 Whi.ch ' , ::
<br />.~le~ lli(ltVGre\tbaris:tbat"proposed :hen)t.,U /~ea . . Jj
<br />ul:'rwJ.r?::::' '.'.~~i::~:l trll \in4 li.lVant'Wlll ly waa ~ired to reatore to, . . . ... fi
<br />ii1!l:~o:nd ~i\'lllilBr td.tu4ti~n 1• t.he Waldron '(a.pplieation on Pagernua' ?::'ji
<br />·tb.11'1 :Q:t'Cl'it•rt.:1 cwna:t,,vae denied the'.right. to cut down hia yard' "ii,
<br />ii'"' ,Q~uJll1t¢ti(al'flith tHU':illiilnary ~horeline!bank repairs, to create a'";;:
<br />J.J..;;'"'t:HJ.1: .. , 'i'b~. litlff1i~nca., it bet.ween tho•e requeats and .the 'current ·'
<br />$ diffe~<Mi llm'lgnitude of :the' propoaee cuts. Prom
<br />,...,ii,\., .. ,..,,,1. i;t.e~int, the w.alk~ut cut sh.;;ulf.i have on.Ly
<br />or. qu~Z'!t.ity . of .run-off .. w~t•r enterin~r th~O lake.
<br />thlii to aac~at• :the revised ~iveway
<br />11u1d the propoaed ddveway 9rachl!ls are ·rather
<br />r~tli!l'II aay incre<11u111e. '-'be d:d veway apron would appear to
<br />a. 10~ iiilop@ immediately atart:i.ng at the garage door. The whole
<br />,,.·l!l.~<A•1;1'el a.~ef.Uillif iii tuation seo11 rat.ha~. questionable,.
<br />..,.,..., ... .,.. on the location of the existing and proposed atructures. the
<br />,H.,thi:.ck encroachment 111 reduced under the proposed plan, and no
<br />e:id.~ti1ag site lines an furUer restricted by construction of
<br />.ho1u,e.
<br />l.l~gm:d:ing hardcover, the numerical effect.a of tne major incr&tu!les of
<br />hard~ov~r on the property are somewhat diminished by the relative size of
<br />the propiu:t.y, but the steep 1iil0pe1 tend to make the hardcover increases
<br />more significant than on flat lots. Overall hardcover on the pro)?cU:-ty
<br />increa~eG fro~ 6,700 a.f. to about a,300 s.f. The amount of structural
<br />hardcover on t.he property is more than doubled. The increase in the 75-
<br />250' 2one from 26.5\ to 391 ie slightly towards the high end of what has
<br />lly been approved on Baldur Park. The total proposed hardcover,
<br />as a percent of the total lot area in hardcover, is propv~~d at
<br />i6.8~, which is very typical of what baa oc~~rred on Baldur Park (see
<br />Exhibit L).
|