Laserfiche WebLink
cr•ate walk-out in t.h• o-1s• <br />~pplicntions which have recently·been ~~~•~1"4 <br />thlii C:U;;,y, 4llthough the magnitude of• thia requeat. is reb.tively <br />OOllip~~~d to ta~oae other cases. · <br />4. P):'e1ervadon of mature trees on this property might be con11d.de:r;m.'r · <br />as a reasonable hardship, becauae those trees help to soften:the <br />potential vertical harshnesa of this construction as viewed froa <br />across the lake. <br />5. The proposed fill generally oc~uring in the 75-250' zone is <br />apparently necessitated by the attem~t to raise the house, thereby <br />eliminating a more aevere walk-out cut, but resulting in what could be <br />a problem driveway situation. Retaining walls may be appropriate in <br />some areas. The garage could be lowered a few feet to help the <br />grading situation. Drainage must be directed down the lot lines and <br />not on to neightoring propertiee. <br />:,.,1 Commission is requested to either make a recommendation to <br />the City Council or to give applicants direction to revise the request and <br />br:ng back an alternative site plan.