Laserfiche WebLink
;:for t.he Be;~y•s,. p~fiUllent.ed <br />:residE:nice, garage and t.h1s oak· <br />,,, ............ of what he w1u1S proposing to <br />H~U'dlOD. did not.. believe the. <br />site • <br />..... "'"""'"' wl·uit:h(:lr t.h• oak tree would survive the <br />LwtdhlildeoaaultedaprofeHiona.lwho info~d <br />t:r~® would band toward its root11,.. lumce. this tr@e <br />to hav• it.lll main roots away from the area to be <br />· · ~@ al.\Jo. had aD eatimat<li from a tree 1un:vice that <br />v,~luoo. ~uch a .tree at $46400.00.. Planning Commiaaioner Jol-.nson <br />,,,..,,.,..,.n tiui'i::. any grading that occurred would threaten the oak <br />. . <br />aa::1.4 that the Planning <br />......... .,. ..... in making new atructurea <br />Joitu:i::sc.m c011m~nted that Balaur Park Road was a unique <br />$e~~d to consistently require variances. However, due <br />£Cl"illl4! l:}urt tbe nerrya had to work with, he did not <br />1boul1Sbe·~ n&edfor variances. <br />Tho:t:~ ,.1Gi1:-e no comlllents from the public regarding tbia utter <br />~nd the public hearing wa~ closed. · <br />I·e wasf moved Planning Commissioner Cohen, seconded by <br />Commissioner Moos, to table this item. Kelley provided <br />somll'J dirlll¢tio.n for the applicants. The l? lanning Cotmni1Hion did <br />not want to see at.y hardcover or cut.ting and filling on th1111 north <br />side in the a-75'. Within the 0-75 1 :i:one on the south side the <br />attached garage must be offset by removal of the d*tached <br />Mr. A~nr~~~na hi~ desire to build a three-car garage <br />garage had to he removed. Within the 75-250' zone it <br />was the concensue of the Plarmincr Commission not to allow more <br />than JOI hardcover. They also wanted the applicants to adhere to <br />the lakeshore setback. Bellows informed th~ applicants <br />that iance with the Planning Commission's req,,est.s would <br />cau:!'ll!t a substantial reduction in the si111e of the house. Kelley <br />that a footprint be drawn prior to an actual house <br />The applicant questioned the Planning Co~.mission's opinion <br />the walk-out. Kelley stated that they would not allow <br />a walk-out to be cut on the north side if it required grading in <br />the 0-75' 2:one. The natural contours of the property must <br />rEUna:in. Motion, , Nays•O, Motio11 passed. <br />9