#2370 Scanned File - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

~.i!i!G i,u,a flli2-D.D81al ~ . thlli! applic:tAnt if he had di11cussed this proposal with b:l.s neighbor•? . Hr. B'..iu111uar replied that he had and the 1u,ighbor to the t!::CUth•bad no objeet:.ions. Hr .. Schoenwetter explained that the aei~l':ibor to t.be run':'tb :b&d no opiniOrh mainly .because he was ••lllD'l;i Ms UOU@f$' and ~t'».9 ·.'to Y.1-Qrida. . . , . . ' . »-llOWG ~ri:tliid t.i".ard:: the •leap frogging• circUl'llstance was• . typically col\~o;J;l:'<14 w~r.1 x-eviewinq average lakeshore setbacks. Sb• queat:ioned llihtrt would happen to· the property cU.rectly north•• or Mr. ~U~l!lllrtt§., Gatfron d•;,iated tbe lakeshore setbacks for the propart;ioe -to th~ ;:.,,:,;;~th., X4lley okn1uu:ved that if one. were. to a.raw a line bet.Wt11iin tl1.e two hcu:'.!ies on the north to the south, it w<,nld ru;:;. ,;),lt s.nto th'3 l&kth 'l'be s11un:e would occur on the south sidli.. 'l'hia i:!ii -typical of properties located on point• or peaina·o.la.' Ilic, .-.t.i .illi thi111 pro~.rty. · · · •,, ' . . . !'her@ were no c~nts troa the public regarding this matter and the· public hfHil.r:l.ng wae clo1ed.. :.:t. weu, movt1Hi by Chairman J:elley., seconded by Planning Colllllliaaio~er Cohen, to ree0Ui:11end approv&l of application tl362, subject t.o abardoovc;r rctuuction of 417 a.f. from what.ever aource availabl.•, and to appa;ove the average lat:eshore setback. u1 defined. 'rhe hardahipa of th.if.I application would be the property · l-:>eing located on th.a point &nd the addition being 160' from the lak ore. Motion, Area•7, ~ays•O, Motion passed. 01363 ROGD Iii ~T :aD'RY 1~92 BI.LOOJl PAmt ~ VAJilIUC2S . i Plra~ ~IIIG ti::,2 P.H .. -8:55 P.K. . . . ~'l'he Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. · The applicants were present for this utter. A~ e)(t)lained by A~1istant Planning and·toning Mtdniatrator Gatiron, the Berry•a were ••eking variances in order to demolish an existing r••id•nce and rebuild. Currently the hardcover on tho property consists of a detached garage, as well as a driveway that continues uphill to the existing house. ~he proposal calls for a new residenCf!I with a porch, deck and attached garage. The drivewa:i' would rcain in the same area, but would become sl:i.g,.~ly st•eper. It is the intention of the Berry's to maintain the detached garag~. In order to access the new, attached garage, it will be necesaary to raise a portion of the yard by bringing in fill i., the south 0-75' :one. The Berry's are proposing a. walk- out which will require grading to be done within the no~th 0-75' zone. One of the reasons the Berry's preferred not to locate the house further back to meet the average setback, is to preserve a mature red oak tree. Gaffron said it would be necessary to make a 2' cut in order to achieve the walk-out. Planning Commissioner Bellows expre~sed her reservations of 8