Laserfiche WebLink
i1615 1tin(jo.- Subdivision .... _ _� .._._ ...._._....�.���..�..:...�...._..._:..............+.i+r..a.;:....:..:r.:..a:N. <br />Pag12 4 <br />Lot 2, Block 1 <br />Peres PB21 thru PD26. Borings BB21 thru PR23. perc rates <br />for bith t:rimary and alternate sites are acceptable. Slopf•n are <br />nearly level at the tested sites, ranging from 0 to 3%. Mottling <br />indicated below 2', with actual water table at 3.2 to 4.21. A <br />standard mound system should be used due to the pr,:sence of shallow <br />saturation zones. <br />Lot 3, Block 1 <br />Peres PB31 thru PB26. Borings BB31 thru 8833. Slopes in the <br />primary site are apprcxirately 6-81, on a slight flattening <br />Of the 10-12% slopes surrounding it. Borings in the primary site <br />indicate 1 to 2 ' of loamy topsoil over a 6" layer of organic clay <br />topsoil over a plastic sandy clay. Actual water table at the <br />primary site was below 51. However, the high plasticity indicates <br />a heavy clay that is probably baturated. The secondary site was <br />rnottled below 1-5 feet with an actual saturated zone at l' depth. <br />Coupled with a slope of 10% the secondary site is marginal for a <br />round aystcm and would require at least 2' of sand bane an part <br />of the design. I suggont that standardpresoure moi,nd system <br />ba required for both sites with addea sand depth for Lhe second-1-y <br />system. Plc2se note that this lot is the r..c3t tenunus in the <br />subdivision in terrii of olope and soda r_onaideration far using <br />a round system. Should a proposed housa location encroach on <br />either of the tested sites, careful revica and possible additional <br />tcr;tinq will be needed to ensure that a mound can still be used. <br />The site do^s not appear capable of supparting any kind of R trench <br />sycte.'m. <br />Lot 4, Block 1 <br />Peres PB11 thru PE346. "orings 1041 thru BB43. Slc, co average 51 - <br />7% overall. Borings indicate actual ••eater table at 4' with mottling <br />at a depth of 3-4' for tha primary and 2' at the accondary site. <br />Porc ratc3 wer^ fairly uniform throughout thono teatcd sires. A <br />deFr::�ssion/draina,^:• y to the ir..: ^diate south of the taatel sitar <br />r,a^t be rvoidecl during construction of '::re a;,3tc,73. would <br />rccon rend a standard proaaure round for both niter. <br />Lot 5, BV nk 1 <br />Peres PI351 thru PD56. E::)ri.ngo D351 thru DD53. Slopo3 are 31 to <br />6% overall. Mottling at the prit:ary sito started at 2.7 co 3.5' <br />:pith actual water table at 3.7 to 5.31. z-his site in acceptable <br />for a standard mound The alternate site has a perc rate <br />conjidored too slow for any system by close <br />scrutiny shows that the pores were taken at depth its the candy <br />clay subsoil, not in the topsoil. In general, throughout the entire <br />subdivision the touting dons at a dirth of 12", in tho topsoil, <br />indicates acceptable percolation rateq, with tooting at 24" or more <br />indicating slowar, marginal perc rhea. in my opinion, thin situ <br />in no different than c.o-.t of the cthora, and would have an acceptable <br />perc rntc if tested at the 12" depth in thu, sandy learn topsoil. <br />NO further 'tooting should be rrqui.redt a m.-)und uyntrm is rero-mended. <br />