Laserfiche WebLink
i615 Rir.ge-- SubdIvininn <br />Page 5 <br />Lot 6, Block 1 <br />Peres P861 thru PB66. Borings BB61 thru B063. Average perc <br />rates at both sites are accop'table. Slope© rangy: from 2 to 4%. <br />Mottling started at a depth of approximately 2.4 feet, with <br />actual water level at 2.5 to 4.4'. A standard mound system <br />should be used at both sites. <br />Lot 7, Block 1 <br />Peres I'371 thru '_°B76. Borings BB71 thru BB73. Slopes average 2-3%. <br />Pere rates were fairly slow, with the secondary rite being somewhat <br />slower than the limit (however, the justification for Lot 5, <br />Block 1 also applies here). Actual water level ranged f_o.a 1.7 <br />to 3.5' with mottling generally below 2.5'. A standard *round is <br />reco=onded for both sites. <br />Lot 1, Block 2 <br />Peres PAU thru PA18. ncrings BAll thru BA13. Slopes are very <br />flat. t.cttl'.,-Ig Wa3 indicated below 2.2 ' with actual Miter <br />encountered below 2.0'. 11 o necondary sitoc wore tested. All <br />sites are acceptable for a standard trcund system. <br />Lot 2, Bloc): 2 <br />Peres PA21 thru PA76. Borings DA21 thru IM23. Very flat eloper. <br />Mottling occurs at 2.0 to 2.4' with actual water encourtercel <br />below 2.41. Pcrc zaten on both sites are acceptabl3. A trosn9 <br />uyatem is reco-- ^_nded for both cites. <br />Lot 3, Block, 2 <br />Peres PA31 thru PA35. Eorings PA31 tfiru I'A33. Slop^3 avcran^d <br />2 to 5t. i:ott? ing ntarto at a depth of 2.0-3.5' . JNctu-il '.or <br />level was below 2.51. Pcrc rates arc• acceptable. !'��^d %tat-':nn <br />are rccomam-,ndTd for both 3itc3. <br />14ot 4, Block 2 <br />Peres FA41 thru PA46. Borit.g3 DA41 thru PA 3. Slopes are very <br />flat. Mottling generally was found b�lc:a 2.0', with actual <br />water level at about 4.01. Pcrc rato for prir-----i site is <br />acceotablet perc rato for secondary s to in sla =fitly a2ow but <br />a. ,aptable for a mound based on the justification referred to <br />for Lot 5 Block. 1. I recommend a mound systcri for both dites. <br />Lot 5, Block 2 <br />Peres PA51 thru PA36. Boringo BA51 thru rAP,3. Slopn3 are very <br />flat. Mottling occurred below 1.2 fcot with actual �,.ater holo4 <br />4.0 feet. Perc rates are accr'ptable for the prir,'iry sit- :-nd <br />slightly slow at the cacondary site. (R;nfor to Lot 5, Block 1) <br />This lot has the overall wor3t: cot of percolntion rates of tho <br />division. 'lloweve_•, only two of the pores tore taken in the <br />topsoil, the o:hcrs, tti.ju of which were v:!t-y nlrw, were at Onpth. <br />I recommmend that a tround 3ystrm be utied on thin Mite. If. t;«rca <br />ware re -taken in the topsoil, it is likely th.cy would );a^3 as <br />Jid nearly all others done in this manner. <br />