My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
N
>
North Shore Drive
>
3165 North Shore Drive - 09-117-23-33-0002
>
Land Use
>
05-3135 VAR
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/11/2025 12:03:46 PM
Creation date
9/11/2025 12:03:21 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
161
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE• <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,November 27,2006 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (5: #05-3135 ALLEN MUNSON, 3165 NORTH SHORE DRIVE, Continued) <br /> Munson stated in his view the six-foot variance was reasonable. <br /> Sansevere stated in this situation the adjoining property owner has an issue with the encroachment and <br /> that the average lakeshore setback is designed to protect the views of the neighbors. <br /> Munson stated given the row of trees,the adjoining property owner would not see his new house. <br /> Murphy inquired whether Mr. Wagener was shown the revised plans. <br /> Munson stated he did show his plans to Mr. Wagener and erected the posts as requested by Mr. Wagener. <br /> Peter Johnson stated shortly after the last meeting Mr.Wagener and the applicant did have a conversation <br /> at the site. The applicant was requested to erect two poles demonstrating the proposed height of the new <br /> structure. Mr. Wagener's architect reviewed the revised drawings and came to the conclusion that the top <br /> of the parapet is now at 967', which is six feet higher than what was originally proposed. Johnson stated <br /> in March it was their understanding that the elevation from top of the first floor to the top of the parapet <br /> was 32 feet. <br /> Munson stated the plans are not to scale. <br /> Johnson stated they do have an interest in determining the elevation of the residence, and at the beginning <br /> of the discussions Mr. Wagener told the applicant he would not object if the encroachment remained the <br /> same as what currently exists,which is a one-story dwelling in that location. Mr. Wagener has also told <br /> the applicant that he would be willing to remove some of those trees that are adjacent to the lot line. <br /> Sansevere inquired whether that is still the intent of Mr. Wagener. <br /> Mr.Wagener stated he is willing to remove approximately 30 feet of some six-foot tall bushes. <br /> Sansevere inquired how the proposed home fits in with the character of the neighborhood. <br /> Gaffron stated he does not feel the home is out of character with the neighborhood and that the main issue <br /> is the impact to the neighbor's view. <br /> Sansevere reiterated he would not be in favor of the encroachment. <br /> McMillan stated she does not see the neighbor's trees as constituting a hardship and that she would not be <br /> in support of the variance. <br /> Murphy inquired which plans are not to scale. <br /> Munson stated he does not know which plan Mr. Wagener was using to measure from but that it is his <br /> understanding the City allows 32 feet. <br /> Gaffron stated the proposed residence is a two-story house and the City allows two and a half stories. <br /> Gaffron stated they measure from the existing grade,which is approximately 938' at the far corner, and <br /> • <br /> PAGE 6 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.