My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
N
>
North Shore Drive
>
3165 North Shore Drive - 09-117-23-33-0002
>
Land Use
>
05-3135 VAR
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/11/2025 12:03:46 PM
Creation date
9/11/2025 12:03:21 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
161
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,November 27,2006 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (5. #05-3135 ALLEN MUNSON, 3165 NORTH SHORE DRIVE, Continued) <br /> The revised proposed residence has a flat roof with a parapet. The top of the parapet is about 30 feet <br /> above the existing lakeside grade. The prior plan showed a 27-foot height on the lakeside. The new plan <br /> meets the City's height limits. The portion of the house within the average lakeshore setback consists of <br /> two stories and is a six-foot encroachment. <br /> The City Engineer has not had an opportunity to review the revised plans. <br /> Staff recommends approval of the fill CUP, subject to confirmation by the City Engineer that the grading <br /> and drainage plan is acceptable. The applicant is proposing to bring in approximately 2350 cubic yards <br /> and will be placed on the landward side of the house. Council should review with the applicant the basis <br /> for not meeting a 5-foot fill setback. <br /> Sansevere inquired whether the house could be pushed back six feet and still keep the same footprint. <br /> Gaffron stated the location of the house probably relates to topography and the view of the lake. <br /> Munson stated the further back from the lakeshore you go, due to the tree line,the side lakeshore view is <br /> lost. <br /> Sansevere commented the fill issue is not a major issue,but inquired whether Mr.Wagener's view would <br /> be impacted by the encroachment. <br /> Wagener stated he has met with the applicant three different times,with a request being made of the <br /> applicant to set corner posts,which was completed, and his surveyor marked the elevations of the <br /> proposed house. Wagener stated the Mandel house pushed the average lakeshore setback closer to the <br /> lake. Wagner stated he would like to see a house that is similar to the existing house,which is more a <br /> low-profile structure. <br /> Sansevere stated the applicant is not excessive on the height but that he does have a concern with the six <br /> feet encroachment being proposed. Sansevere commented the City Council generally listens to the <br /> comments of the neighbors when attempting to reach a decision on a variance request and that the City <br /> Council encourages the neighbors to work together to reach a workable solution. <br /> Munson stated he has attempted to contact Wagener numerous times but has been unable to reach him <br /> personally. <br /> Sansevere stated he is not supportive of the encroachment if it impacts a neighbor's view of the lake. <br /> Munson stated there are two extremes,with the house to the north being located 75 feet from the <br /> lakeshore and the other house being located 300 and some feet back from the lakeshore. <br /> Murphy stated the average lakeshore setback is one of the more stringently enforced ordinances of the <br /> City. Murphy questioned whether the applicant feels it is okay to encroach into the lakeshore setback due <br /> to the trees and still be okay with locating his house in a position that would impact the neighbor's view. <br /> Murphy stated he does not see a hardship in this situation to grant the variance. <br /> PAGE 4 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.