My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet Cc - regular meeting 7/25/1988
Orono
>
City Council
>
1988
>
Agenda Packet Cc - regular meeting 7/25/1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2025 10:14:48 AM
Creation date
9/9/2025 1:29:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet CC
Section
City Council
Subject
regular meeting
Document Date
7/25/1988
Retention Effective Date
9/9/2025
Retention
Permanent After File Date
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
332
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #1280 <br />Page 2 <br />Existing Proposed <br />0-75' 30.4i 36.08 <br />75-250' 6g,0% 46.6% <br />4. Although the hardcover does show slight decreases in both <br />0-75' and 75-250' zones, the applicant's intent is to <br />increase structural hardcover on the property by half again <br />as much as now exists. The structural increases are in <br />additional decks and in additional structure. The <br />structural hardcover changes are as follows: <br />Existing <br />Proposed <br />0-75' (N) 1,313 s.f. <br />2,157 s.f. <br />75-250' 637 <br />709 s.f. <br />0-75' (S) 0 s.f. <br />0 s.f. <br />_ <br />1,950 s.f. <br />2,866 s.f. <br />Net Change <br />+916.s.f. <br />5. The proposed hardcover removals and additions are shown <br />on applicants diagrams which are listed as Exhibits G and H. <br />Note that th existing deck of width 9.4' will extend <br />approximately :loser to the lake, according to the <br />design plans. f W, because the existing second story deck <br />above the west om will become a living room, applicant <br />is proposing a xpansion to the west. <br />6. Note that the additional room expansion, where there <br />currently is no structural hardcover, is between the house <br />and the garage, where it will have no significant visual <br />impact from the northerly lake, but will be quite visible <br />from the west. <br />7. Applicant is proposing a 5' separation between the new <br />construction and the existing garage, with the new addition <br />to be architectur illy attached to the garage by a covered <br />walkway. From a zoning code standpoint, this would appear <br />to require a variance to the requirement of 10' separation <br />between buildings. From a fire safety standpoint, the <br />garage and the house can be constructed with the appropriate <br />fire walls so that building code standards can be met. <br />8. Note that the proposed additions will be constructed to <br />meet the side setback requirement of 10'. <br />9. The current structure jutting above the house does meet <br />the required 30' maximum height limitation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.