Submittal - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

.rd To: Planning commission Chairman Kelley Orono P1e ,ninq Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building 6 Zoning Adm:-istrator Date: August 10, 1988 Subject: #1312 William J. Lauer, 3165 Nor_h Shore Drive - Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-1B Total Area = 62,308 s.f. or 1.43 acres Pertinent Ordinance - Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Hardcover variance required within the 75-250' setback area. Total Area = 26,533 s.f. Allowed Hardcover = 6,633 s.f. or 25% Existing Hardcover 7,748 s.f.. or 29.2% Proposed Hardcover = 8,250 s.f. or 31% * (Staff approximated hardcover at 8,005 s.f. or 30.1%) Hardcover Increase = 502 s.f. or 1.89% * Please note that staff has not received a complete survey showing all hardcover. Exhibit E is a staff sketch of existing hardcover finding hardcover at the 0,005 s.f. level. AFplicant's inventory shows ar. increase of 245 s.f. over staff's calculations. List of 9zhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Property Owners List Exhibit C - Plat Map Exhibit D - Hardcover FdC.t Sheet Exhibit E - Staff Sketch of Hardcover at Time of Building Permit Application Review Exhibit F - Survey Exhibit. G - Floor Plans Exhibit H - Elevations benriw of Application - The applicant proEoses an addition consisting of a grade level attached two stall garage, an expanded family room to the rear, and a second story bedroom expansion over the new addition (review Exhibits G t A). The proposed improvements result in a 1.81 increase in hardcover within the 75-250' setback area. Applicant notes that there is no hardcover within the 0-75' setback area and that the house is located approximately 175' from the lakeshore. The majority of the surface drainage from the improvements on the site run over the expansive grassed yard betore it reaches the lake. In addition, the applicant notes that there is no excessive amounts of hardcover within the 250-500' setback area. In Light of recent Planning Commis.ion and Council action, applicants have been held to no increase in hardcover where excesses of hardcover exist with proposed new imt rovements. In cases where a turn- around is required so that a resident did not have to back out onto a public roadway, Council has re-consider.vd the policy of maintaining hard- cover at present levels.