Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File i1284 <br />Page 3 <br />south and as a result the deck structure provides no visual <br />imr•tct for the residents. <br />d. Both affected property owners have submitted letters <br />approving the subject structure. <br />e. The west half of the property that contains the majority of <br />the hardcover drains away from the lake toward Bohns Point Road. <br />Approval is subject to the following conditions: <br />1. Applicant must remove 751 s.f. of existing hardcover within the <br />75-250' setback area. Hardcover must be maintained at 25% within the <br />75' to 250' setback area. Applicant must designate the areas to be <br />removed, prior to the staffs scheduling the application for the <br />Counci l's final action. <br />2. Per the City's fee schedule, applicant must make an additional <br />payment of $150.00 for the After the Fact variance application. In <br />addition applicant must pay a penalty ft with the building permit <br />that has yet to be issued for the new structure. <br />3. The structure will be inspected by the building inspector to <br />determine if said structure conforms to all required standards of the <br />building code. If said structure is found to not conform with the <br />building code, than required alterations must be made within an <br />appropriate deadline of the approval of the Council. <br />Additional Cosssents and Staff Recosssendation <br />Add Exhibit M - Revised Survey <br />The Planning Commission members listened to the applicant's response <br />regarding the ^ircumstances surrounding the After -the -Fact application. <br />The chairman advised the applicant how difficult applications such as this <br />are for members to deal objectively with, especially since there appeared <br />to be no serious or intense degree of variance sought regarding the <br />existing deck structure. <br />Planning Commission concurred with staff's recommendation that there was <br />definately a need to reduce hardcover if the structure is to remain. <br />Members questioned the applicant on the specific structures that existed <br />within the the 0-75' setback area and asked if they could be removed. <br />Applicant advised that the shed was really a pump house, but that the <br />barbaque area was probably not that important and could be considered for <br />removal or at least portions could be considered for removal. Rather than <br />seeking just a total reduction within the 75-250' setback area, the <br />Planning Commission conditioned approval on a reduction of a total of 3.4% <br />of hardcover within the 0-250' setback area. Review the amended survey <br />(Exhibit I) that designates the areas of existing hardcover recommended for <br />removal. The 6' by 8' shed has been replaced with a low 3' by 4' structure <br />that houses the puwr . Portions of the barbaque area have been also removed <br />except for the stove part. All of these were located within the 75-250' <br />setback area. The majority of removals within the 75-250' setback area are <br />the existing walkways around the house and portions of the bituminous <br />surfacing adjacent to the home. Please note, the app l i cant was not <br />required to remove anything within the 250-500' setback area, but he.s <br />removed soi 380 s.f. of Existing hardcover within the area. The following <br />adjusted hardcover facts ire presented below as follows: <br />