Laserfiche WebLink
0 <br />We were bc.h shoc.:ea. .. say the ;east . t.ec•_._ <br />e <br />foI I owed er er• .. r eq. oet 10 .,, P' `e�, . <br />7( : 3pp_: er... , ra e r•ee:. ,s:.:g <br />;-.ear. <br />ZWo di. nt things. ... c_ ....^et.,.. i 3e <br />nor. e <br />a.^,a <br />had insta, .ec a .9rct .. _._7 h <br />S3', <br />t .n <br />your term. ROl ogy 7 31, a`. e"-e <br />the Prop-rt. 'ct :e a:­iey .k P;�:x. <br />-re-. <br />would insta. 1 a 6 fen::!e . o..na the p^v. <br />.neant r e <br />understood that t. e rer �-e c seE <br />=ce e _ ... e-.. <br />re'. t ,:as necessary. �e '�.a. . _>;:t _ =r� <br />,; rte-.. :� ._ .. <br />dtscus3.0^.5 3t the <br />. QG. <br />statements c: nter.. 'ere c,. ^'' '.e.roers <br />sc a' 0 e <br />questioned the ocat ;or, of the ^P­ , r re: <br />xt ...P _ •.^r a" .� <br />property lines. ;:thee ths,^. Ty st_.._..._ .tg <br />.. intent t:^ rep.are <br />existing tending as necessa:. r: o me....0r <br />as pec.ti ^a. , mac <br />s <br />ate gut <br />fencing along the side :_.t ' .yes--be:�n.se <br />•e _naerstooa that __ <br />,nere <br />we were agreeing tc F;ace t^e :erc.r,a. :c, <br />._.rderstc:cc us to tie <br />placing the fence sorr,e•-mere . r:s. r:e .^r . .. yes' <br />It would meal. great hardship for us :: ..,e �,•rre rein_.,red tc <br />re -place the fencing. :. !reuid a!sc c7reate an extrem.e.y unattractive <br />environment for the e:ghborhooc. re: ate tc you my reasonir:g ir, <br />point form: <br />1 .) Fencing set hack frorr. Br . ar St. our actua l <br />property .ire would tie an jns.ght., tie'1;3ton from <br />other fencing done in the C:­yRt a 5,y Brea. <br />Inspector �•ou:c reveal :hat hedges or other propert:, <br />enclosures along Crystal Bay streets are set tU pith;n <br />only a few feet of those srree*s. Tr.-, �esthet:cal' <br />p;easing to the eye. <br />2.) The new rence is NOW i n ; re .. -er,c : r.g or cur <br />neighbor s property to the SoLitn. <br />3.) The plantings in our yard were aes;dined to complement <br />the fence as it origira,ly existed. <br />4.) Someone would have tc care rcr the right-of-way outside <br />of a fence placed on our yctu.: property line. without <br />regular care that right---: •.-By °c:1 d become ve: •,• unsignt l.. . <br />If it is within our fenced area. •:e would care for, :t <br />diligently--3t our expense of money arc: effort. <br />5.) Moving the fence from its present Dc3tion :nward would <br />eliminate much of the prcpert;- we had Per ceivea •-�e ,.,ere <br />buying last October. :t .•Bs reasonab:e con us as buyers to <br />assume fencea-in property oe'�::nged to the Anderson s. <br />6.) Moving the fence would negate se:era: exhausting days <br />of personal labor. Every post ho'e ,,,as dug cy me <br />manually. The fence was painstaking., 1evelea and <br />carefully positioned to be a credi#, tr• the neight]onccoc. <br />We improved the e:: ;sting l oo�, of the ne i ghbo: hood. at <br />our expense, by rep; ac; rig .an .ors: ght l y rence. <br />1.) Moving the fence with snow aria ce on and : n the ground <br />would be a task I cculcn t ,inciertal,.e. Tye na the to-ce <br />down would leave a potential it-a3.^,gero..s pool --per, to <br />neighborhood children or pets. <br />