Submittal - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

00 Ms. ;eanre t j sr Jr on. Lear Ms. This :ette-- or this aate. ..s: ;515e regarding *he p. Men' o: unaerst ana, r,o m'i Commission, ana the me ..::1s. deceive the c. f i I ed a,' cey..es! e.j 00:..'.1m..e,n; t R an thought .gas ....a . 3ppr o',e. c' misunderstand:na the proceas -:ee s ; N: a. :' r and e..e• . On the criy ..a. 3:,a%:e 'Se .gIp,.-.st.or. -�s e. as on the building pewit application. : stated the intent to erect e fencing. My intent trorr,� the beci=,r:o G tc ree';cF ;^e ailan;a=rFa Picket fence along 5-.ar St. and rep ace renc:^g. as eedea, along the two property ! iries. Spec;`. "-�ra`.'tir' tt '^3' er2e^� r :'9 r`Ot requested of us by anyone, ana ': e ::. c no; t h i nY to prop' : oe .11 since it warn t asked 'or. The on!., aiscussicn -71ss regaraing the need tc remain under the d height to avoid hav:ng tc; inc:uae the •rho e yard in the lot coverage calculation. we aid me-,;:r..^ ; coup;e of times the nights of the Pianr.:ng Commission and C-Ounc. eer.ings our :n.tent to remove the bac- l ook. i ng p: ci,.e t rence a' c;,g B: : ar "-na to rep': ace t new fencing. Councilwoman. Peterson sa;a she na: ooservea the property that day and agreed the p;Cket rence neecsea rep :3c;-a. No one else commented about the fence. Its }oration •.JaS e,:aent to anyone who saw the property, so I rn surer;sed no one brought up it's near prcy1rn:t,• tc. Briar. if that is a concern. We comp!ieo .::th the requirement to remain under 6 Bra erected the fence '.'here Qe had alt,ays intended tc:. Pon Anderson. the previous owner or the prcpe,ty, had placed the white picket fence in its 'oration near Briar St. to e ;,r r;; the fence already existing on Mrs. Mabe! Belt -E� proper — property to the South. We s:, pi; rep' acpa line. After position.ng his rence aiong Hr:ar St..-..I,e: c a fair amount of lanascapiro. !hich -e .^,a.e s:pp'P^:r'-- s;r;ce mo..ra ir, last October (Io88). There ire a .^ er t f.re e-ergreen rrees 1t are progressino very t•'ei ; within tnF or:w.-,a' :er:_'P:j .ar ra • .. - obviously positioned to complement the fencing. :'here ;s even an. Oia building foundation that extends over our actual property :ine. A'' of those things made it clear to us that the fence 3ho;:la be placed to replace the ex;sting one. if the ne:-, rer:ce were mc•:ec: r. to the actual property I i ne , it would Place :.' 1 Of the ! anascape:: trees outside the fenced area and the b,,=i;, largest ree :s pcss;oi;-• r;ght on the line. We received a ye 1 1 ow nc•. ice from a .: 7g. . nspecr: r i n ;47o•-,emDec CI m told Nov. 6th) and was requested ;c ca:. r�gara:ng ;tee re. ter.v I caked the city office that day. but the inspector 4.39 nC; ,r;. left a message with the clerk secretac, to have hiz cat! me. Aa not receive a call back so I assumed he must have ookea up our permit and decided everything was okay. Ther �,e rece.,:ea ccrrespenae—: -e trorn you dated Nov. 28, indicating there is a mis:,nderstanding.