My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 1364
Orono
>
Resolutions
>
Resolution 0001-7547
>
Reso 1300 - 1399 (July 27, 1981 - August 9, 1982)
>
Resolution 1364
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2015 11:54:28 AM
Creation date
11/13/2015 11:54:28 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
P,aul Fahlin <br /> � Pa.ge 3 <br /> � � <br /> d�4� C�t� o� ORONO <br /> • r'YT. ' <br /> . }' ' <br /> -;�'���' , RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> •�� NO. 13 6 4 .. <br /> � ��':;�; <br /> • � • �,�r. <br /> . tT_ <br /> 10) The expansion of the commercial use will create <br /> increase in traffic for an area of Shoreline Drive <br /> °that� has a long history of congested parking and <br /> traffic problems. <br /> 11) An inspection by Mike Gaffron on August 11, 1978, <br /> found the existing septic system to be substandard. <br /> 12) The maintenance and operation of a bait shop wi11 <br /> create increased demands on the existing substandard <br /> septic system. � <br /> 13) The property can not satisfy the area requirements <br /> of the Orono Septic Code for both principal and � <br /> alternate septic sites. <br /> 14) The proposed use would not be a less non conforming <br /> use in the surrounding lakeshore residential zoning <br /> zoning district but in fact is considered an expansion <br /> • of the commercial non conforming use and in complete <br /> violation of Ordinance 31. 108 . <br /> 15) The multiple uses proposed for the property are <br /> considered a change to a more non conforming use and <br /> in complete violation of Ordinance 31. 101 and <br /> Resolution 961. • <br /> 16) The City has consistently denied variances for an <br /> expansion of a non conforming use or a change from <br /> one non conforming use to another. <br /> 17) Ordinance 34 . 320 - permitted uses in the LR-lA <br /> zoning district - does not permit a ,commercial bait <br /> shop. <br /> 18) "Use" variances to allow uses not permitted by the <br /> zoning code are forbidden by Minnesota 1aw (462. 357 <br /> Subd. 6 (1) ) . <br /> � 19) The multiple uses proposed would create additional <br /> . parking and septic demands on a severely limited <br /> property thereby creating a potential threat to <br /> the public health, safety and welfare. <br /> 20) The proposed expansion of th��ommercial uses will <br /> have detrimental effects on the property values of <br /> the surrounding residential neighborhood. <br /> • 21) The proposal would be against the intent and object� ves <br /> of the Orono Zoning Code and the Comprehensive <br /> Community Management Plan. <br /> . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.