My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-23-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Orono
>
City Council
>
1988
>
05-23-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2026 10:57:02 AM
Creation date
9/2/2025 1:19:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet City Council
Section
City Council
Subject
regular meeting
Document Date
5/23/1988
Retention Effective Date
9/2/2025
Retention
Permanent After File Date
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
393
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
advance of the project being undertaken, spread the <br />special assessment based on bid information.) <br />Issue 5. Preliminary Financin4 Plan - Primary means for <br />financing are -as follows: <br />11 <br />A. Storm Sewer Assessment - The Coun0(lutake the <br />project and choose this alternativco t er <br />are footage on a flat basis wouldr if so e <br />on ideration were given by a great.for th <br />prop rties directly there may be a split betwee _ an <br />Attachment F shows approximate assessment 1la s <br />by p operty and who the property owner is. <br />B. Storm Sewer District - The City could establish a <br />storm sewer district for this area and on an ad valorem <br />basis and levy taxes over a specific period to pay off <br />this project. The advantage of this approach is that <br />the benefit principle does not have to be demomstrated. <br />ALTERNATIVES - <br />Issue 1. Public Hearing <br />a. Conculde the public hearing <br />b. Hold the public hearing open for further testimony at <br />further Council meeting. <br />Issue 2. Response to Petition <br />1. Choose not to undertake the project <br />2. Determine a public solution is appropriate to this <br />problem. <br />3. Table for Future meeting <br />Issue 3. Means to Undertake <br />1. Take a combination of the following: <br />A. 21 inch pipe down the access <br />B. 21 inch along line of current drainage tile <br />2. Other Alternatives <br />A. The property owners can replace the existing tile <br />line and increase the size of the pipe from 8"-10" <br />tile to 15" CMP (corrigated metal pipe) with an <br />overflow structure at the outlet end of the <br />culvert under Highwood Road. we could assist the <br />property owners in obtaining materials and <br />contractors. <br />B. The City could replace thiF sting tile line <br />with a 15" CMP (corrigated pipe) with an <br />overlfow structure at the :t end of the <br />culvert under Highwood Road. <br />City forces could do this for $15,000 - $16,000, <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.