Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, August 19, 2002 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />(#02-2819 TIM DEVRIES, Continued) <br />the past. He would not require the applicant to obtain a new survey, since the City is not typically <br />concerned with type 1/2 and their impact on the septic, or the septic impact on them. <br />Mabusth questioned condition #1, the grading boundary for the septic in the northern area. <br />Gaffron stated that he was unsure where the silt fencing ran on the northern piece with regard to <br />the septic site location. <br />Mr. Robin stated that the fencing runs through the wooded area and the stumper was self <br />propelled so as to lessen the disturbance. <br />Gaffron suggested that the applicant leave a 30' -50' buffer uphill and to the side, along with <br />heavy duty clearly marked fencing up north, to ensure positive controls of where the dump trucks <br />are driving and putting their fill. <br />Mr. Robin stated that they will add signage to the silt fencing and communicate in dollars and <br />cents with the drivers about where, and where not to, place the fill. <br />Smith asked if any provisions or direction could be given to the applicant, with regard to <br />lighting, in order to avoid any future issues with neighbors. Either by suggesting the type of <br />lighting or hours of operation. <br />Gaffron acknowledged that the Commission felt the need to tighten up the restrictions as a matter <br />ofrecourse if the neighbors are unhappy with how things tum out. <br />Smith maintained that she did not want to be confronted with problems from neighbors' 6 <br />months down the line. <br />Mr. Robin asked if they were proposing to tie the issue of lighting to grading. He pointed out <br />that the applicant was committing to meet zoning issues and ordinance requirements with regard <br />to the visibility of lighting, and they will do their best to make sure they are not creating a <br />monster, but beyond meeting the City's ordinances they could not commit, in public, to <br />something they don't know how people are going to react to until the actual thing is finished. <br />Gaffron concurred, stating that the City cannot always ensure the future happiness of neighbors <br />and regulate to do so. <br />PAGE23 of28