Laserfiche WebLink
s• ,r �- �rc,l •` _st .�., 1 is ►nt <br />r.WS <br />ail nf an•a'.!i'ion to hic 1v, a <br />�. r a �:, i•r, r �'.+' •� s, s: I. nt XUI u' -flit'1 •1 a <br />Ilri A'. s:1 ; stilIII iI VA:,• T. <br />pr-- 111 c .—ting of cxs,.; 3inr Vic y.arare to a <br />I'R(sitr:Fb NT►i'ilM Ty) <br />ted 10' fr t!10 -W, and 10' fran t!se rear lnt 1' -c- <br />lr,.a, <br />'tTLI !'4 IT; •:7:-1''►:; ,, •,� <br />T'%e t` ird Ft -Ill t vsld he to store his cx-ner. 1'se <br />Wr <br />boat w^uld he -,tcred in the northra-st coiner of the Int. <br />(1137) <br />!!r- tkl,len rrr,�rnteti A written statenent of n;1pro%-al for the <br />hence ad•lition and garage from the nei,rli",ors Fltwd rnrie uei <br />CcrnId r.•tv. <br />At the prrvia}s iocting t_tie Cc—ics;on i+s,li,ated their cnn- <br />eetn a`Iatt the haTkI.-o •er. Mr. 0,1.7•n rtatc-d that t'.c dri ve- <br />wav %Mold `v of crushed rock rather Lean hlacltop or con- <br />c,(•te. -his ao,tld el i rinate the hardccver to :one 1. <br />lie also prest,t^d a legal opinion to confirm the �•+cr nt <br />status on the •►, erty. The P1.lnninq Cs.—ission :;,s not <br />satisfied tith .'se dollulcnt. <br />After a brief discussion. V;Lrsel moved, !?tnlap secoryled, <br />to recorrend approval of the lot area and width variance <br />for the pmposed additica subject to providing proof to <br />our city attorney indicating there are no e.—c7tent <br />proNlerrs. lt,tion - Ayes (S), Vays (0). <br />Mr. Pihl was present. fie zoning I..bini-trstor stated CIi%RLFS HIS <br />that the applicant is requesting approval to rirrapp the 2605 NORM WIRE i)RI%'E <br />shoreline to prevent further crecion. This would tic a RiPRAP <br />continuation rom th- neighbor's pro,crty line to the (0244) <br />creek along the west side of his property. <br />1lunlap roved, Pecek seconded, to rero•-mnd approval on <br />the condition that the rock used for this rip —nap be 12" <br />or more in dianeter and subject to approval of the <br />other agencies. i►btion - Ayes (S), \ays (0). <br />The Zoning Att-iristrator reminded the Umnission of ti'.kLrEttC PJRT MGIF I.Ir.'' <br />the discussinn •hick trek place daring the work session 6 1tk1%%7 Nk%rr A,SSM. <br />at their la_ct reeting concerning the metal seawall vs. 1►AI t:5 PORT l.AMIN <br />riprap. Mr. Hartmann, representing the Association, (0:45) <br />presented the proposal for dredging and several options <br />of shoreline protection. Several other nte*ers of the <br />Association were also present. <br />The Cc-rd5sion felt that the drruging and shoreline <br />protection were two sepante issues. After a brief <br />discussion, Pesek P ed, ltmlap seconded, to recommend <br />•aproval of maintenance dredging to a reasonable depth <br />to allow the pmperty ok-ners legal riparian right to <br />have navigable access. The spoils mould need to be <br />reeoVed from the lake area. Subject to approval of the <br />other agencies. !k+tion - Ares (S), %'als (0). <br />