Laserfiche WebLink
:'T ; !Il LD N'RIL 4, 1!iii <br />�tr. (kldrn owls jr< .c•nt. Anng pliclnt is mqur�tivariuhce for <br />Addition to the side of his hou,-e. There has been a conflict <br />were I�cated. �tr. Odden now has <br />Its to where tTk caseT,rr►ts <br />ts to be -Orr Tle�tion conrerning the <br />aMill seems n abstract. Punning C,,Irission rc!Tlcstcd <br />location of the eascr+ent. this <br />e opinian in <br />applicant to sut+mit 1a1cL^t�ir�strator tat thatorder tthe lapplicant <br />matter. The Zoning Pro snd access <br />has added a garage since the last ed garage <br />e would meet the <br />would be on the %est side. Proposed a difficult <br />up <br />low side setback; hoMever, it would Ile difficult backing hat Mr. Odden in <br />1n the turn arn,ind. it was suggested <br />eighDors to a set- <br />a letter of )^p <br />Lack variance. <br />planning Carmission was concerned about the Thar. obilerhome <br />Mr. Odden is now storing two cars. sail Coat, <br />Tie prnF'osed garage <br />and a cabin cruiser on his property. <br />l <br />would store some of this. <br />After a brief discussion, Hassel moved + resek seconded, <br />to table this matter conditioned on the following: <br />(1) Clarification of easerent location through title <br />opinion to the Cecian attorney' <br />.� o setback nriance from <br />(2) Letter of no obj <br />adjacent neighbors. <br />(3) Percertagr of hardcover in Zone 2. <br />motion - Ayes (5) , Nays (()) • <br />Clayton Hangs and Dick Freeborn were present. The Zoning <br />Administrator stated that the applicant is requesting a <br />required area. <br />lot width the required width. ance. This lot exceeds <br />ThZoning oning {administrator <br />but lacks the required substandard lot which <br />expressed concern, for the adjoining, substandard <br />indicate that <br />already contains a home• gangs stated <br />there is one owner for the two lots. Mr- There <br />that there are two owner. property is sc.cesed. <br />was some discussion regarding the special assessment <br />status. <br />After same discussion, Pe+sek moved. Dunlap secoMed, to <br />reconmend denial based on the following: <br />(1) Both lots were under one coml"M owner in 1- <br />1977 <br />January 1, 1975, and recorded as %uch in the <br />tan records. •.,tin house is extremely sub- <br />(2) Lot containing B <br />ft.) <br />standard (9.01 t rw imately 1/2 <br />(3) Two lots ccr oru.,ist o. ape <br />acre of <br />dry rrcedence for similar pro- <br />d) Mould be cent <br />PC- aIs almg sh,relines and marshes. <br />►•o,tion - Avcs (`). <br />ra(;F. 2 <br />w 11.1, I AM ODDFN <br />;450 NpRTII 511rRE DRIVE <br />I fi AREA 6 wigni VARIANCE <br />PRf)i'tYSED ADDITI11N TO <br />TUTUING (N N(T` �FnR�11NG <br />Il2 (35) <br />WARREN OR 'ENBLAD <br />1865 9iADYWOOD ROAD <br />VARLANCE - WT WIIN <br />(1238) <br />