My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet Cc - regular meeting 4/25/1988
Orono
>
City Council
>
1988
>
Agenda Packet Cc - regular meeting 4/25/1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2025 10:14:46 AM
Creation date
8/25/2025 12:59:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet CC
Section
City Council
Subject
regular meeting
Document Date
4/25/1988
Retention Effective Date
8/25/2025
Retention
Permanent After File Date
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
439
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
drainage district and that then those persons are assessed on an <br />area basis as to what they contribute to the drainage runoff. <br />The problem is that the people on the high ground generally do <br />not consider the water to be a problem and it is only the people <br />on the low ground that would receive a direct and obvious benefit <br />from such a project. <br />At the point that the feasibility study is completed and it is <br />determined that the benefits do outweigh the costs and those to <br />be assessed are not willing to sign a 100% petition waiving <br />assessment of those costs, staff will present possible <br />alternatives for either City participation if deemed appropriate <br />by the Cot, sil or establishment of a general fund levy to use to <br />fund all storm sewer projects that the Council deems appropriate. <br />The advantage (A going with the general fund levy is that this is <br />not appealable, however to the extent only limited isolated <br />projects are undertaken the general populous does not benefit <br />from the levy. This is particularly the case in an area where it <br />is anticipated frost or a substantial amount of the properties <br />particularly those located on the lake or next to wetlands are <br />not in need of any future storm water work. <br />RECOMMEN_DATIO_N_ -Based on the concern as evidenced in the <br />petition together with staff's recommendation that the problem is <br />appropriate to undertake a feasibility at this point. <br />PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by __, seconded by _, to direct the City <br />Engineer to form a feasibility study to determine the appropriate <br />remedy to limit the storm water runoff which causes a problem in <br />the Highwood area. Ayes + , Nays _ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.