Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #2050 <br /> August 15, 1995 <br /> Page 4 <br /> Based on the above, the 20' x 35' pool plus the 6' patio around it is considered as <br /> structural hardcover, proposed to be offset by removals of non-structural hardcover (rockbeds <br /> with plastic or fabric and a concrete patio area not associated with the pool, which may or may <br /> not be considered structural hardcover). <br /> Structural Non-Structural Total <br /> 1995 Existing: <br /> 0-75' 0 s.f. 0 s.f. 0 s.f. <br /> 75-250' 4,350 s.f. 4,745 s.f. 9,095 s.f. <br /> 250-500' 315 s.f. 4,070 s.f. 4,385 s.f. <br /> 4,665 s.f. 8,815 s.f. 13,480 s.f. <br /> 1995 Proposed: <br /> 0-75' 0 s.f. 0 s.f. 0 s.f. <br /> 75-250' 6,003 s.f. 2,955 s.f. 8,958 s.f. <br /> 250-500' 315 s.f. 4,070 s.f. 4,385 s.f. <br /> 6,318 s.f. 7,025 s.f. 13,343 s.f. <br /> Issues for Consideration Lo7- CcU '- )0,3 '✓, <br /> • Do the proposed hardcover removals (1,390 s.f. of landscape areas and 400 s.f. <br /> of concrete and wood patio) compensate for the new hardcover associated with <br /> the pool? <br /> • Are there additional items of structural or non-structural hardcover in the 75-250' <br /> or 250-500' zones that could be removed? <br /> • Does the fact that there will be no hardcover ithin 115' of the lake suggest a <br /> unique justification for the variance? <br /> • Does the overall proposed hardcover of just under 22% for the entire property, <br /> compared to the DNR's standard of 25%, enter into the picture? <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> Planning Commission should review the findings of the previous resolution as well as the <br /> applicant's hardship statement in the application form. Any motion to recommend approval <br /> hardcover issues, detailingyour <br /> address the average <br /> should setback variance as well as the <br /> findings of hardship and specifying any hardcover removals that should be required. <br /> 1sv U(/ E C TO c' f 1 °ti'--31-74. <br /> PA--r44)v s � <br /> rt3 32-.C 60. t.. s <br /> A-jC.. <br />