My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
N
>
North Shore Drive
>
2180 North Shore Drive - 10-117-23-31-0098
>
Land Use
>
10-3442, CUP
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2025 1:33:43 PM
Creation date
8/21/2025 1:33:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
2180
Street Name
North Shore
Street Type
Drive
Address
2180 North Shore Dr
Document Type
Land Use
Permit Number
3442
PIN
1011723310098
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
329
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
White noted the City of Orono does not have a hospital. <br /> Bremer stated she understands what Mr. LaQuey is saying nut that this is a different facility from a <br /> school. <br /> White asked whether they would use oxygen in the patients' rooms. <br /> Miller noted they would not be and that it would not be lice sed as a psychiatric hospital. It will be <br /> licensed as an eating disorder structured living program through the State of Minnesota. Eating programs <br /> require both medical and psychiatric treatment. i <br /> Maddie asked whether the other locations have received an complaints. <br /> Lindsay Brown stated they have not received any complains. <br /> 1 <br /> Miller noted the City of Chaska actually asked them to look at other potential sites within the City of <br /> Chaska to house this facility. <br /> Bremer stated she would like to address the conditional use permit, and that it is her understanding that <br /> once a conditional use is granted,that conditional use permit stays with the property. Bremer <br /> acknowledged the City Council has to look at other potenti 1 future uses this property could be used for <br /> once The Emily Program vacates the structure. Bremer not�d the City does have some letters of support <br /> in the file as well. <br /> Mattick stated the issue of potential future uses varies from pity to city. The state legislature mandates as <br /> part of the city's own zoning,that if an entity comes to a cit$ requesting a building in a single-family <br /> residential zone and has a maximum of six beds, it is a pernlitted use and does not require a conditional <br /> use permit. The Emily Program is proposing 10-beds,which is not a large facility,but does require a <br /> conditional use permit. <br /> (6. #10-3442 THE EMILY PROGRAM,2180 NORTH SHORE DRIVE, Continued) <br /> Typically a conditional use permit does run with the land fo ever, and that the City is governing the use of <br /> the property with a conditional use permit. The city can limit the number of people that it can house and <br /> it can also place other restrictions on the use. Mattick point d out that currently people can be ordered to <br /> a residential home provided it is not a lock-down facility wi hout the City's permission or knowledge. <br /> Mattick indicated he is familiar with The Emily Program. 111ie variance is also necessary and would run <br /> with the land. The City determines setbacks to be what they deem appropriate for the district. Mattick <br /> noted the City does have the ability to place certain restrictions on the conditional use permit. The <br /> applicant has indicated they are agreeable to withdraw from the conditional use permit should they ever <br /> vacate the premises. Mattick stated in his view if there is a voluntary action to withdraw the CUP, it <br /> would be enforceable. <br /> McMillan asked whether that CUP withdrawal could be cha lenged by the potential buyer of the property. <br /> Mattick indicated it conceivably could be,but that the recor would reflect an agreement to voluntarily <br /> withdraw the conditional use permit by the applicant. Staff as discussed the fact that CUPs are intended <br /> to be there forever provided the conditions are met and that ne alternative would be to approve an <br /> interim use permit,which would have a time limit imposed n it. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.