My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
N
>
North Shore Drive
>
2180 North Shore Drive - 10-117-23-31-0098
>
Land Use
>
10-3442, CUP
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2025 1:33:43 PM
Creation date
8/21/2025 1:33:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
2180
Street Name
North Shore
Street Type
Drive
Address
2180 North Shore Dr
Document Type
Land Use
Permit Number
3442
PIN
1011723310098
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
329
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
White stated the City is only required by state law to notify •roperty owners within 350 feet of a property <br /> that has submitted an application and that the list is provide' by Hennepin County. <br /> Danielson asked where the sign has been posted on the Hill School property regarding this application <br /> and that they are only hearing about this through an e-mail it at has been forwarded on a number of times. <br /> McMillan noted there should have been a sign posted. <br /> Danielson stated the person who initiated the e-mail does n 1 t live in the immediate adjoining area. <br /> i <br /> Turner stated they were probably notified because their name is connected with the common area. <br /> Bremer indicated the City obtained the names of the property owners from Hennepin County. <br /> Danielson stated they do not have a problem with the Emily'Program but that she does have a problem <br /> with the City of Orono. Six other communities within the s ate of Minnesota house The Emily Program <br /> and those facilities are located within mixed use districts. <br /> Miller stated the Chaska location is in a townhome develop ent and it has been in that location for the <br /> past five years. <br /> Danielson stated she put together a list of The Emily Program's other locations and the businesses that are <br /> within a block or two of them. This neighborhood is exclusively residential,which would be an <br /> exception to that. Danielson asked what other alternatives there are for this property and why a quiet <br /> residential neighborhood is being forced to accept a 24/7 m dical facility. Danielson concurred there will <br /> be less traffic with this use than The Hill School,but the pe ple working for The Emily Program will be <br /> working around the clock. There will be lights, noise,traffi , and people who do not reside in the <br /> neighborhood driving in and out of the neighborhood at all ours of the day and night. <br /> I <br /> Danielson asked what kind of safeguards there will be to gu4rantee that this property does not turn into a <br /> detention for delinquent teens or a center for sex offenders. ,'The new tenant may not be as easy to accept <br /> at this site as The Emily Program. Danielson urged the City Council to protect the neighborhood and find <br /> (6. #10-3442 THE EMILY PROGRAM, 2180 NORTH SHORE DRIVE, Continued) <br /> a more appropriate use for this property. Danielson recommended the other 88 property owners be <br /> notified and also be given an opportunity to comment on this application. <br /> Miller stated he understands the neighbors' concerns and th.t they are not new concerns. In his opinion <br /> the neighborhood will not suffer because of The Emily Pro: am and it is doubtful this structure can be <br /> used for the other uses suggested by Ms.Danielson. Miller noted one way to protect the neighborhood is <br /> for the City to cancel the conditional use permit after The E I ily Program is gone. <br /> LaQuey stated as it relates to the fire department,the Orono Fire Department is not close to the facility. <br /> White indicated he understands the issues raised by Mr. La S uey relating to the Orono Fire Department <br /> and that the fire safety concerns raised by Mr. LaQuey are nit valid ones. White requested Mr. LaQuey <br /> limit his comments to concerns not already raised. <br /> Mr. LaQuey asked what experience the City has with hospit;1 fires. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.