Laserfiche WebLink
from the Hill school property. Could this ecome a precedent-setting <br /> decision for tearing down a residential pr perty and rebuilding a medical <br /> clinic? It certainly appears that way. 1 <br /> 4. The granting of variances is not necessa for the preservation and <br /> enjoyment of a substantial property right f this or any other <br /> applicant. The applicant has available us s for this property. <br /> 5. Both the St. Paul and St. Anthony Emily rogram buildings are located in <br /> business/mixed-use districts. <br /> 6. The granting of the variances has the pot ntial, both in the short and long <br /> term, to negatively affect the surrounding residences. <br /> 7. Regarding conditional use standards that re not met, the proposed use <br /> I. <br /> will be detrimental to properties in the vi inity due to the inadequate <br /> buffers around hospital and similar medi al uses; and the proposed use <br /> will not comply with the City's Zoning Code but will require variances to <br /> be permitted. <br /> Finally, there are other important issues that ave simply not been <br /> adequately resolved, such as parking, where here is clearly a net deficit -- <br /> and the lack of transparency surrounding the specifics of the conditions for <br /> use. <br /> In summary, a permanent change to the zo ing standards to allow hospital <br /> and similar medical uses on the Hill School property will permit <br /> substantially intensified uses on a site that is just 29% of the required size <br /> for a facility of this nature. Clearly, this per anent change would pose a <br /> significant risk to the surrounding communi Pi , my neighbors, their families, <br /> and my family. For all of these reasons, I as , that you reject the applications. <br /> Thank you. <br /> 5 <br />