My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-11-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Orono
>
City Council
>
1988
>
04-11-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2026 10:57:02 AM
Creation date
8/19/2025 2:01:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet City Council
Section
City Council
Subject
regular meeting
Document Date
4/11/1988
Retention Effective Date
8/19/2025
Retention
Permanent After File Date
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
341
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
,j , <br />TO: M.r; A and C.ty C.I.Cil <br />PROM: oirk Uernhardson, City Administrt,tor�;l <br />DATE& DeCeMotr t. 1985 <br />SUDJCCT: Metro Waste Control Comm i:.:on/Orono Interceptor Project <br />1 <br />Attached please find a lettar that f have addrasned to Olsro Cook <br />regarding Donestroo's proposal to be the engineering consultant <br />t irm for Matto Waste Control Commission on the study of MMCC's <br />Orono interceptor system. The interceptor system is the system <br />that starts in the west end of Minnetonka Beach and tons up <br />County Road 19 and east on County Road 51 to the old Orono rreneh <br />Lake sewer plant. This is the line that was originally put in <br />during the Orono sewer construction and over the years has at <br />times exceeded the capacity that it was designed to handle. This <br />has resulted in sawago, not only in basements but raw sewage over <br />flowing out of the lift stations and being dumped into Lake <br />Minnetonka. MWCC has programmed to improve this for the past few <br />years and is at present in the process of awarding the project o r <br />•n engineering firm to determine the most appropriate way to <br />merest the problem. Additionally they have programmed about two <br />million dollars to actually fund the improvement ptujeet. <br />P reprisals wen submitted Ly three engineering firms of w <br />Bonestr00 was One. We do have some concerns that a poten, <br />conflict of interest might exist, however, a have Outlined thw.e <br />areas and It MMCC does not have significant probless, we from a <br />staff standpoint see that on balance, it is of benefit it <br />Sonestroo were awarded the contract, because of their history <br />with the system and knowing it has problems and having a vested <br />interest to improve it to Orono's benefit. <br />Should you have any further questions plea" feel tree to contact <br />me. <br />PROP02CD MOTION - Roved by seconded by _ that the City <br />Covr.c is &seepthe intureattT on from state relating to the <br />f MCC/Orono Interceptor. Ayer _ , Nays _ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.