Laserfiche WebLink
1. Accept the petition with the current number of signatures. <br />2. Recommend that one additional signature be obtained indicating <br />to the signer that this does not bind them to an agreement for <br />the assessment. <br />3. Table the matter. <br />4. Reject further consideration of the petition regardless of the <br />number of signatures. <br />5. Accept the petition and order the feasibility study provided <br />the property owner is willing to pay r0% cost cf the feasibility <br />study should the City decide not to go ahead with the protect. <br />RECOMMENDATION - Given the unique nature of this issue and the <br />fict_that_storm sewers generallv have a few persons who are <br />affected but many persons who Cont, bute to the problem, that the <br />Council undertake the feasibility study in an amount of $1,500 as <br />noted in Attachment F, assuming that the cost of the feasibility <br />study would be included in any project, should it be ordered to <br />go ahead. The staff will be responding to the second F it t i on of <br />Attachment A for the April 25th meeting. <br />PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , that the Council <br />accept the petition as currently submitted anti order the Engineer <br />to undertake the appropriate feasibility study for this matter if <br />the two owners petition agree to 50% of the feasibility study <br />test if the pr 1. ject does not go forwar,l. Ayes , Nays <br />CC ; David Davenport, Lindquist & Vennum <br />Todd Waters <br />J. Dennis <br />Glenn Cook, City E:!gineer <br />