Laserfiche WebLink
REDUCTION IN FEDERAL GRANTS AND AID Tn CITIE:; <br />Housing/Community Development. In 1986-1,+: , nnesota cities and counties <br />receiver' $46.7 millior Community Development Biuck :.rants (CDBG). Fer Federal <br />Fiscal Year 1988 (Octoher 1, 1987-September 30, 1988), cities and counties can <br />count on receiving an average of 4 percent less than last year. Deficit reduction <br />negotiatio„s between Congress and the Administration actually resulted in greater <br />losses to cities than those proposed earlier by either House or Senate. Cutbacks to <br />entitlement cities (those over 50,000 population or in a SMP 'I could reach 5.2 per- <br />cent this year since more cities in Minnesota are now elig, a i 'vier that program. <br />The eight entitlement cities in Minnesota will receive a total of $22.9 million in CDBG <br />funds this year. Nor entitlement cities will benefit from $17.6 million in Small Cities <br />CDBG competitive grant funds `or '88; four urban counties in the state will receive <br />$5.7 million. <br />In additior, the reduction in tax incentives for low and moderate -income housing <br />construction jae result of municipal bond restrictions imposed by the 1986 Federal <br />Tax Reform Act) was compounded by further cutbacks in federal housing assistance. <br />Nationally, these funds declined by more than 3 percent compared to the previous <br />year. <br />Clean Water/Wastewater Treatment. For c" ng for federe, matching <br />tyrants to comply with federal risen water stand, was more discouraging <br />news aeaompar.;ing the del reduction agreemei .ants for wastewater treat- <br />ment con -tion were slsn cut by 4 percent, leaving cities with $28.6 million in <br />federal gram .unds, comp .red with almoot $30 million in 1986-Lr. <br />Transp . Public tr� sportaaon funding as well as federal revenues to as- <br />sist highv truition and airport development have been dispropc'ccrately <br />reduced 'or .. Not: , transit finding suffered even more severe , 13acks <br />xlan other areas of tr„r ation funding. Chie oth urban and rural areas ex- <br />perienced declines In i transit assistance of an estimated $2.4 million since <br />1986-PI. <br />c In early November, .386, President Reagan signed. 'o taw <br />1.7 billion to eliminate drug trafficking, improve drug :ca- <br />as rehabilitation and treatment programs and reduce ,ug- <br />. ie.ot3 was scheduled to receive $7.4 million in Federal Fiscal ': rat <br />.48', P.v • .Aare of the special loca(,overnment and community group a:av <br />,ij'1,:: tu•"^- .j was set at ,? 9 million Faced with the deficit and compet:.ig <br />d 1t= reverTlss, Congress ncc s:ashud funding Cy nearly , percent for fisce l <br />1988, <br />Federal Mandates. 1.1 the meantime, many of the ntnadetes approved by the <br />1986 Con. =ss have becume effective during 1987. One. n particularhas affected <br />cities, re,auving oficiAs to design more cur,prehensive emergency response plans <br />for control of hazardous substances. Cities are discovenrj that they must eemply <br />with corfusing and burdensome (even unworkable) recuirements for extensive <br />reporting and notification procedures. Severe clod +nd even criminal penalties apply <br />18 <br />