My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-22-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Orono
>
City Council
>
1988
>
02-22-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2026 10:57:02 AM
Creation date
8/18/2025 10:02:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet City Council
Section
City Council
Subject
regular meeting
Document Date
2/22/1988
Retention Effective Date
8/18/2025
Retention
Permanent After File Date
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
374
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
submitting the final plans for approval. In advance of the final <br />approval the City has been considering its financing as noted in <br />Attachment E and F. The total project cost for the entire three <br />city project is $4.5 - 5 million. With the City responsible to <br />provide funds for $428,000. This a new estimate that is down <br />from the original $488,000. <br />Issues identified at the Council's November 9, 1987 meeting <br />included concern regarding sidewalk on both sides, the use of <br />special assessments for funding a portion of the project and the <br />penalty the City would incur for utilization of MSA funds related <br />to the use of MSA funds on a County State Aid Highway project. <br />DISCUSSION - <br />ISSUE 1 - FINAL PLAN APPROVAL_ - The principal focus of concern in <br />advance of people seeing the final plans was the construction of <br />sidewalks, the cost of which for the City of Orono would total <br />about $47,000. Among those present at the November 9, 1987 <br />meeting were indisiduals who expressed the opinion that there was <br />rot a need fcr sidewalks in their area, as there were few <br />pedestrians and that there would be encroachment into certain <br />properties. During the week of November 16th, John Gerhardson <br />has been reviewing these plans with any parties who have been <br />interested to call. The original inclusion of the sidewalks on <br />both sides by the County was in response to an agreed to request <br />by the three Cities because of the narrow width and relatively <br />high volume for an essentially two lane road. Additionally <br />although no objective data cxist to indicate such, installation <br />of sidewalks along a fairly narrow route will tend to generate <br />pedestrain traffic where none existed before because people did <br />not feel it safe to use without sidewalks. Additionally the need <br />for sidewalk on both sides is the fact that it is difficult to <br />cross from one side to the other on a busy street in order to <br />utilize a one sided sidewalk system. <br />- Maintenance - Related to the installation of the <br />sidewalk is the maintenance of that sidewalk. As this is a <br />"regional" sidewalk and the fact that of sporatic snowplowing or <br />removal by abutting property owners is a concern, the City could <br />undertake snowplowing for a "regional" sidewalk system as the <br />City does have the capability with its current equipment. It is <br />expected the City would do this generally within a two to five <br />day time period after a snowfall when all the streets have been <br />opened up. Additional cost of this would be the time/overtime <br />available or needed to undertake this, which once constructed the <br />City will be better able to estimate the amount. (Probable under <br />$2, 000) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.