Laserfiche WebLink
CI )UNCIL MEETING <br />TO: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members F= 8 -$1989 <br />City Administrator Bernhardson FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator CITY Orr <br />ORONO <br />DATE: February 2, 1988 <br />SUBJ: #1232 Betz Builders inc, & Clement C. Kroll, 60/100 Stubbs Bay Road <br />- Preliminary Subdivision - Pesolution <br />List of Exhibits - <br />A - Application <br />B - Property Owners <br />C - Plat Man <br />D - MWCD letter 12-18-87 <br />E - Cook letter <br />F - Preliminary Plat <br />G - Drainageway/Retention Pond Plan <br />H - Plat Map of Neighboring Properties <br />Review of Subdivision - <br />The applicant proposes a 5 lot division of 2 parcels - Lots 1 thru 4, <br />Block 1 owned by Betz Builders and Lot 1, Block 2 set aside for future <br />development and owned by Clement C. Kroll. The subdivision plans confirmed <br />2 acres of dry buildable in each of the 4 lots on the south side of the <br />plat road. The private road shall serve all 5 lots. The existing driveway <br />serving the northern property shall be closed off and all access to Lot 1 <br />Block 2 shall be the plat road. <br />The existing tennis court on Lot 1, Block 2 does not meet the required <br />SO' setback from the private road but neither did it meet the 50' from <br />Stubbs Bay Road nor was is it in line with the front line of the principal <br />structure at the time of construction. All other structures meet the <br />required setback from all newly proposed lot lines. <br />The four 2 acre lots have tested out with mound systems for both <br />principal and alternate explansion sites; septic testing will. not be <br />required for Lot 1, Block 2 because it exceeds 5+ acre in area. Staff has <br />recorded no problem with existing system that serves the residence. Former <br />residence structure and accessory buildings on proposed Lot 1 Block 1 have <br />been removed as a result of a separate hazardous building action and were <br />never part of this current subdivision review. <br />The City will ask for standard drainage and utility easements along <br />all lot lines. The drainaqeway to the ponding area to the south of Lot 3 <br />has been directed along the share(' lot line of Lots 2 and 3 at a 15' minium <br />width on side of the shared lot line. Pondinq area in Lot 3 shall be <br />designated as a drainage easement on the final plat and described in <br />angles and bearings. The area of the retention pond has been excluded from <br />the dry buildable calculations for Lot 3 (Review exhibit E) Cook asks that <br />the drainage swale be at least 8 to 10' wide the whole length of the <br />drainage way. The developer has the option to either place riprap or <br />a storm sewer pipe in place of the swale ditch. In addition, the engineer <br />asks that the road plans show proposed grading changes adjacent to the <br />