My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet Cc - regular meeting 1/25/1988
Orono
>
City Council
>
1988
>
Agenda Packet Cc - regular meeting 1/25/1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2025 10:14:45 AM
Creation date
8/12/2025 1:25:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet CC
Section
City Council
Subject
regular meeting
Document Date
1/25/1988
Retention Effective Date
8/12/2025
Retention
Permanent After File Date
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
242
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 11, 1988 <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: <br />i643 BRUCS CURTISS <br />1920 FAGRRNESS POINT ROAD <br />VARIANCE <br />RESOLUTION i2342 <br />Attorney Joseph Christensen was present on behalf of Mr. <br />6 Mrs. Bruce Curtiss. He requested clarification of <br />Zoning Code Section 10.03 Subdivision 15(c). <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted the issue of <br />structure encroachment/non-encroachment within the 75' <br />lakeshore setback area for Mr. Christensen. She noted <br />the issue in the Curtiss application is a variance for <br />fence structure within the 75' setback area and that <br />Section 10.'-3 Subdivisior 15(c) only applies to <br />encroachment of yard requirem its not required setbacks. <br />Mr. Christensen explained that reducing the height of <br />the 6' fence to 3-1/2' would eliminate the sight <br />obstruction and therefore eliminate the need to &ngle <br />the fence near the driveway. He also noted that angling <br />the fence would create a less useable yard area for the <br />Curtiss'. He noted the issue of the portion of <br />Fagerness Point Road located on the Curtiss property. <br />He stated that the Curtiss' would grant the City an <br />easement in exchange for not requiring that the fence be <br />removed out of the road right-of-way. <br />Staff concurred that if the fence were reduced to 3- <br />1/2', there would be no need to angle the fence, subject <br />to no plantings in the Pightline area over 3-1/2' in <br />heiqht. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson stated that staff <br />recommended the City easement issue be pursued <br />independently by the applicant and not tied to any <br />variance approval. Because of the delay in this <br />application, staff recommended amending the date for <br />removal of the panel section of the existing fence to <br />February 16, 1988. <br />Mr. Christensen explained that Mr. Curtiss did not plan <br />on removing any fence panels, just cutting them down. <br />He requested that the Curtiss' be allowed until <br />approximately May lst to complete the modifications to <br />the fence. He clarified that the Curtiss' would like to <br />leave the fence as located, reduce height to 3-1/2', <br />install a gate and extension of 3-1/2' fence on east end <br />up to the 26' wetland setback line. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.