Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD SI:PTEMBER 21, 1981 <br />#1201 HILBI:LINK/VOGT CONTINUED <br />In response to Bellows' concern, Zoning Administrator <br />Mabusth stated that the City Engineer and MCWL will be <br />reviewing tha actual defined wetland area. <br />#643 BRUCE i LAMILLE CURTISS <br />1920 PAGRRNESS POINT ROAD <br />RECONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE APPLICATION <br />Zoning Administrator. Mabusth explained the issues <br />involved: 1) Providing a turn -around required as a <br />condition for variances approved by Council on 9/14/81; <br />b) allowing a 6' privacy fence that was constructed <br />without Council approval and according to staff <br />partially in the City right-of-way. <br />Camille C rt iss was present for this matter and <br />contended that they have no objection to installing the <br />turn -around but believed that ;::lie City was opposed to <br />the turn-arouni because it would result in more <br />hardcover. <br />Planring Commission and staff noted that based on the <br />documentation from 1981 provided, the turn -around was <br />zequired. <br />Ilanning Commission recommended and Mrs. Curtiss agreed <br />to installing the turn-arounu. <br />Regarding the remaining issue of the fence, Mrs. Curtiss <br />st-ted she was unaware that an additional permit was <br />required for the fence and questioned that the fence was <br />partially in the right-of-way. She noted that no <br />further construction has been done on the fence since <br />the City's stop work order posted 9/11/86, but it _- <br />essentially completed. She submitted a petition fro- <br />tier neighbors stating they have no objection to the <br />fence. She stated that the fence is needed for the <br />safety of children. <br />Zoning Administrator Mahusth notes .,at in the 1981 <br />review, t-he narrow depth of the lot a.id minimal grassed <br />yard arez was discussed. There was no discussion of a <br />fence fou,id in the review of that applicat4on but it is <br />applicabip in the appl'-ation for reconsideration. <br />Chairman Kelley sugg, that a shorter than 6' fence <br />could serve the safety privacy concerns. <br />It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Hanson, to <br />table thi -.tter pending an of f ic.Li 1 survey tc, <br />determine _ - fence location. Motion, Ayes F, Nays <br />0. <br />